浏览代码

net/irda: remove pointless assignment/check

We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
Furthermore, if we had assigned a different value to 'sk' we would
have been calling lock_sock() and release_sock() on different sockets.

My conclusion is that these two lines are complete nonsense and only
serve to confuse the reader.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Vegard Nossum 9 年之前
父节点
当前提交
dc833def42
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 0 次插入3 次删除
  1. 0 3
      net/irda/af_irda.c

+ 0 - 3
net/irda/af_irda.c

@@ -845,9 +845,6 @@ static int irda_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
 	if (sock->state != SS_UNCONNECTED)
 		goto out;
 
-	if ((sk = sock->sk) == NULL)
-		goto out;
-
 	err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	if ((sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) && (sk->sk_type != SOCK_SEQPACKET) &&
 	    (sk->sk_type != SOCK_DGRAM))