Browse Source

[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Thomas Renninger 20 năm trước cách đây
mục cha
commit
75b245b325
1 tập tin đã thay đổi với 2 bổ sung2 xóa
  1. 2 2
      drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c

@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 	if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
-		return -ENODEV;
-	return 0;
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)