Ver Fonte

[ACPI] fix passive cooling regression

Return logic was inverted.
Going for changing the return value to not return zero as it is makes
more sense regarding the naming of the function (cpu_has_cpufreq()).

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3410

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Thomas Renninger há 20 anos atrás
pai
commit
75b245b325
1 ficheiros alterados com 2 adições e 2 exclusões
  1. 2 2
      drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c

@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 	if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
-		return -ENODEV;
-	return 0;
+		return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_increase(unsigned int cpu)