瀏覽代碼

lib: Fix possible deadlock in flexible proportion code

When percpu counter function in fprop_new_period() is interrupted by an
interrupt while holding counter lock, it can cause deadlock when the
interrupt wants to take the lock as well. Fix the problem by disabling
interrupts when calling percpu counter functions.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Jan Kara 13 年之前
父節點
當前提交
e78d4833c0
共有 1 個文件被更改,包括 8 次插入2 次删除
  1. 8 2
      lib/flex_proportions.c

+ 8 - 2
lib/flex_proportions.c

@@ -62,13 +62,18 @@ void fprop_global_destroy(struct fprop_global *p)
  */
 bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
 {
-	u64 events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
+	u64 events;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+	events = percpu_counter_sum(&p->events);
 	/*
 	 * Don't do anything if there are no events.
 	 */
-	if (events <= 1)
+	if (events <= 1) {
+		local_irq_restore(flags);
 		return false;
+	}
 	write_seqcount_begin(&p->sequence);
 	if (periods < 64)
 		events -= events >> periods;
@@ -76,6 +81,7 @@ bool fprop_new_period(struct fprop_global *p, int periods)
 	percpu_counter_add(&p->events, -events);
 	p->period += periods;
 	write_seqcount_end(&p->sequence);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	return true;
 }