浏览代码

raid5: get_active_stripe avoids device_lock

For sequential workload (or request size big workload), get_active_stripe can
find cached stripe. In this case, we always hold device_lock, which exposes a
lot of lock contention for such workload. If stripe count isn't 0, we don't
need hold the lock actually, since we just increase its count. And this is the
hot code path for such workload. Unfortunately we must delete the BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Shaohua Li 11 年之前
父节点
当前提交
e240c1839d
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入7 次删除
  1. 2 7
      drivers/md/raid5.c

+ 2 - 7
drivers/md/raid5.c

@@ -679,14 +679,9 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
 				init_stripe(sh, sector, previous);
 				atomic_inc(&sh->count);
 			}
-		} else {
+		} else if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
 			spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
-			if (atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
-				BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru)
-				    && !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)
-				    && !test_bit(STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST, &sh->state)
-					);
-			} else {
+			if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
 				if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
 					atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
 				BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&