瀏覽代碼

ARM: fix the cockup in the previous patch

Commit d6951f582cc50ba0ad22ef46b599740966599b14 upstream.

The intention in the previous patch was to only place the processor
tables in the .rodata section if big.Little was being built and we
wanted the branch target hardening, but instead (due to the way it
was tested) it ended up always placing the tables into the .rodata
section.

Although harmless, let's correct this anyway.

Fixes: 3a4d0c2172bc ("ARM: ensure that processor vtables is not lost after boot")
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Tested-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Russell King 6 年之前
父節點
當前提交
bdd8fd8a2e
共有 1 個文件被更改,包括 2 次插入2 次删除
  1. 2 2
      arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S

+ 2 - 2
arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
  * If we are building for big.Little with branch predictor hardening,
  * we need the processor function tables to remain available after boot.
  */
-#if 1 // defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
+#if defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
 	.section ".rodata"
 #endif
 	.type	\name\()_processor_functions, #object
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ ENTRY(\name\()_processor_functions)
 	.endif
 
 	.size	\name\()_processor_functions, . - \name\()_processor_functions
-#if 1 // defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
+#if defined(CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE) && defined(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR)
 	.previous
 #endif
 .endm