Browse Source

Infiniband: Fix potential NULL d_inode dereference

Code that does this:

	if (!(d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode)) {
		...
		simple_unlink(parent->d_inode, tmp);
	}

is broken because:

	!(d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode)

is equivalent to:

	!d_unhashed(tmp) || !tmp->d_inode

so it is possible to get into simple_unlink() with tmp->d_inode == NULL.

simple_unlink(), however, assumes tmp->d_inode cannot be NULL.

I think that what was meant is this:

	!d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode

and that the logical-not operator or the final close-bracket was misplaced.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@pathscale.com>
cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
David Howells 11 years ago
parent
commit
a95104fd33
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
  1. 1 1
      drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_fs.c
  2. 1 1
      drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_fs.c

+ 1 - 1
drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_fs.c

@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int remove_file(struct dentry *parent, char *name)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&tmp->d_lock);
-	if (!(d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode)) {
+	if (!d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode) {
 		dget_dlock(tmp);
 		__d_drop(tmp);
 		spin_unlock(&tmp->d_lock);

+ 1 - 1
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_fs.c

@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int remove_file(struct dentry *parent, char *name)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&tmp->d_lock);
-	if (!(d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode)) {
+	if (!d_unhashed(tmp) && tmp->d_inode) {
 		__d_drop(tmp);
 		spin_unlock(&tmp->d_lock);
 		simple_unlink(parent->d_inode, tmp);