|
|
@@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ struct perf_sched {
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_runs;
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_timestamps;
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_unordered_timestamps;
|
|
|
- unsigned long nr_state_machine_bugs;
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_context_switch_bugs;
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_events;
|
|
|
unsigned long nr_lost_chunks;
|
|
|
@@ -1032,12 +1031,18 @@ static int latency_wakeup_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
|
|
|
atom = list_entry(atoms->work_list.prev, struct work_atom, list);
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
+ * As we do not guarantee the wakeup event happens when
|
|
|
+ * task is out of run queue, also may happen when task is
|
|
|
+ * on run queue and wakeup only change ->state to TASK_RUNNING,
|
|
|
+ * then we should not set the ->wake_up_time when wake up a
|
|
|
+ * task which is on run queue.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
* You WILL be missing events if you've recorded only
|
|
|
* one CPU, or are only looking at only one, so don't
|
|
|
- * make useless noise.
|
|
|
+ * skip in this case.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
if (sched->profile_cpu == -1 && atom->state != THREAD_SLEEPING)
|
|
|
- sched->nr_state_machine_bugs++;
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sched->nr_timestamps++;
|
|
|
if (atom->sched_out_time > timestamp) {
|
|
|
@@ -1496,14 +1501,6 @@ static void print_bad_events(struct perf_sched *sched)
|
|
|
(double)sched->nr_lost_events/(double)sched->nr_events * 100.0,
|
|
|
sched->nr_lost_events, sched->nr_events, sched->nr_lost_chunks);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
- if (sched->nr_state_machine_bugs && sched->nr_timestamps) {
|
|
|
- printf(" INFO: %.3f%% state machine bugs (%ld out of %ld)",
|
|
|
- (double)sched->nr_state_machine_bugs/(double)sched->nr_timestamps*100.0,
|
|
|
- sched->nr_state_machine_bugs, sched->nr_timestamps);
|
|
|
- if (sched->nr_lost_events)
|
|
|
- printf(" (due to lost events?)");
|
|
|
- printf("\n");
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
if (sched->nr_context_switch_bugs && sched->nr_timestamps) {
|
|
|
printf(" INFO: %.3f%% context switch bugs (%ld out of %ld)",
|
|
|
(double)sched->nr_context_switch_bugs/(double)sched->nr_timestamps*100.0,
|