浏览代码

inotify: Remove inode pointers from debug messages

Printing inode pointers in warnings has dubious value and with future
changes we won't be able to easily get them without either locking or
chances we oops along the way. So just remove inode pointers from the
warning messages.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Jan Kara 9 年之前
父节点
当前提交
25c829afbd
共有 2 个文件被更改,包括 12 次插入17 次删除
  1. 2 2
      fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
  2. 10 15
      fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c

+ 2 - 2
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c

@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ static int idr_callback(int id, void *p, void *data)
 	 * BUG() that was here.
 	 */
 	if (fsn_mark)
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "fsn_mark->group=%p inode=%p wd=%d\n",
-			fsn_mark->group, fsn_mark->inode, i_mark->wd);
+		printk(KERN_WARNING "fsn_mark->group=%p wd=%d\n",
+			fsn_mark->group, i_mark->wd);
 	return 0;
 }
 

+ 10 - 15
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c

@@ -429,18 +429,16 @@ static void inotify_remove_from_idr(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	 * if it wasn't....
 	 */
 	if (wd == -1) {
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p"
-			" i_mark->inode=%p\n", __func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd,
-			i_mark->fsn_mark.group, i_mark->fsn_mark.inode);
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p\n",
+			__func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd, i_mark->fsn_mark.group);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
 	/* Lets look in the idr to see if we find it */
 	found_i_mark = inotify_idr_find_locked(group, wd);
 	if (unlikely(!found_i_mark)) {
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p"
-			" i_mark->inode=%p\n", __func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd,
-			i_mark->fsn_mark.group, i_mark->fsn_mark.inode);
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p\n",
+			__func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd, i_mark->fsn_mark.group);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -451,12 +449,10 @@ static void inotify_remove_from_idr(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(found_i_mark != i_mark)) {
 		WARN_ONCE(1, "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p "
-			"mark->inode=%p found_i_mark=%p found_i_mark->wd=%d "
-			"found_i_mark->group=%p found_i_mark->inode=%p\n",
-			__func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd, i_mark->fsn_mark.group,
-			i_mark->fsn_mark.inode, found_i_mark, found_i_mark->wd,
-			found_i_mark->fsn_mark.group,
-			found_i_mark->fsn_mark.inode);
+			"found_i_mark=%p found_i_mark->wd=%d "
+			"found_i_mark->group=%p\n", __func__, i_mark,
+			i_mark->wd, i_mark->fsn_mark.group, found_i_mark,
+			found_i_mark->wd, found_i_mark->fsn_mark.group);
 		goto out;
 	}
 
@@ -466,9 +462,8 @@ static void inotify_remove_from_idr(struct fsnotify_group *group,
 	 * one ref grabbed by inotify_idr_find
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&i_mark->fsn_mark.refcnt) < 3)) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p"
-			" i_mark->inode=%p\n", __func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd,
-			i_mark->fsn_mark.group, i_mark->fsn_mark.inode);
+		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: i_mark=%p i_mark->wd=%d i_mark->group=%p\n",
+			 __func__, i_mark, i_mark->wd, i_mark->fsn_mark.group);
 		/* we can't really recover with bad ref cnting.. */
 		BUG();
 	}