瀏覽代碼

docs/manual: do not expose CPE_ID_VALID as package-settable

FOO_CPE_ID_VALID is an internal implementation detail. Packages should
really define an actual CPE_ID variable to trigger their full CPE_ID
definition.

Reported-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Signed-off-by: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
Cc: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
[Peter: completely drop any mention of _CPE_ID_VALID in the manual]
Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
Yann E. MORIN 4 年之前
父節點
當前提交
2770ccf471
共有 1 個文件被更改,包括 2 次插入8 次删除
  1. 2 8
      docs/manual/adding-packages-generic.txt

+ 2 - 8
docs/manual/adding-packages-generic.txt

@@ -528,14 +528,8 @@ LIBFOO_IGNORE_CVES += CVE-2020-54321
 +
 +
 If any of those variables is defined, then the generic package
 If any of those variables is defined, then the generic package
 infrastructure assumes the package provides valid CPE information. In
 infrastructure assumes the package provides valid CPE information. In
-this case, +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_VALID = YES+ will be set, and the generic
-package infrastructure will define +LIBFOO_CPE_ID+.
-+
-Alternatively, a package can also explicitly set +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_VALID
-= YES+ if the default values for +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_PREFIX+,
-+LIBFOO_CPE_ID_VENDOR+, +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_PRODUCT+,
-+LIBFOO_CPE_ID_VERSION+, +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_UPDATE+ are all correct for
-this package and don't need to be explicitly overridden.
+this case, the generic package infrastructure will define
++LIBFOO_CPE_ID+.
 +
 +
 For a host package, if its +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_*+ variables are not
 For a host package, if its +LIBFOO_CPE_ID_*+ variables are not
 defined, it inherits the value of those variables from the
 defined, it inherits the value of those variables from the