security-bugs.rst 3.3 KB

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475
  1. .. _securitybugs:
  2. Security bugs
  3. =============
  4. Linux kernel developers take security very seriously. As such, we'd
  5. like to know when a security bug is found so that it can be fixed and
  6. disclosed as quickly as possible. Please report security bugs to the
  7. Linux kernel security team.
  8. Contact
  9. -------
  10. The Linux kernel security team can be contacted by email at
  11. <security@kernel.org>. This is a private list of security officers
  12. who will help verify the bug report and develop and release a fix.
  13. If you already have a fix, please include it with your report, as
  14. that can speed up the process considerably. It is possible that the
  15. security team will bring in extra help from area maintainers to
  16. understand and fix the security vulnerability.
  17. As it is with any bug, the more information provided the easier it
  18. will be to diagnose and fix. Please review the procedure outlined in
  19. admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst if you are unclear about what
  20. information is helpful. Any exploit code is very helpful and will not
  21. be released without consent from the reporter unless it has already been
  22. made public.
  23. Disclosure
  24. ----------
  25. The goal of the Linux kernel security team is to work with the
  26. bug submitter to bug resolution as well as disclosure. We prefer
  27. to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible. It is reasonable to
  28. delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood,
  29. the solution is not well-tested or for vendor coordination. However, we
  30. expect these delays to be short, measurable in days, not weeks or months.
  31. A disclosure date is negotiated by the security team working with the
  32. bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the kernel security team
  33. holds the final say when setting a disclosure date. The timeframe for
  34. disclosure is from immediate (esp. if it's already publicly known)
  35. to a few weeks. As a basic default policy, we expect report date to
  36. disclosure date to be on the order of 7 days.
  37. Coordination
  38. ------------
  39. Fixes for sensitive bugs, such as those that might lead to privilege
  40. escalations, may need to be coordinated with the private
  41. <linux-distros@vs.openwall.org> mailing list so that distribution vendors
  42. are well prepared to issue a fixed kernel upon public disclosure of the
  43. upstream fix. Distros will need some time to test the proposed patch and
  44. will generally request at least a few days of embargo, and vendor update
  45. publication prefers to happen Tuesday through Thursday. When appropriate,
  46. the security team can assist with this coordination, or the reporter can
  47. include linux-distros from the start. In this case, remember to prefix
  48. the email Subject line with "[vs]" as described in the linux-distros wiki:
  49. <http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros#how-to-use-the-lists>
  50. CVE assignment
  51. --------------
  52. The security team does not normally assign CVEs, nor do we require them
  53. for reports or fixes, as this can needlessly complicate the process and
  54. may delay the bug handling. If a reporter wishes to have a CVE identifier
  55. assigned ahead of public disclosure, they will need to contact the private
  56. linux-distros list, described above. When such a CVE identifier is known
  57. before a patch is provided, it is desirable to mention it in the commit
  58. message, though.
  59. Non-disclosure agreements
  60. -------------------------
  61. The Linux kernel security team is not a formal body and therefore unable
  62. to enter any non-disclosure agreements.