浏览代码

net/core: remove explicit do_softirq() from busy_poll_stop()

Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in
sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after
local_bh_enable() has been invoked.
I don't understand why we need this because local_bh_enable() will
invoke do_softirq() once the softirq counter reached zero and we have
softirq-related work pending.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sebastian Siewior 8 年之前
父节点
当前提交
fe420d87bb
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 0 次插入2 次删除
  1. 0 2
      net/core/dev.c

+ 0 - 2
net/core/dev.c

@@ -5206,8 +5206,6 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_struct *napi, void *have_poll_lock)
 	if (rc == BUSY_POLL_BUDGET)
 	if (rc == BUSY_POLL_BUDGET)
 		__napi_schedule(napi);
 		__napi_schedule(napi);
 	local_bh_enable();
 	local_bh_enable();
-	if (local_softirq_pending())
-		do_softirq();
 }
 }
 
 
 void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id,
 void napi_busy_loop(unsigned int napi_id,