|
@@ -2595,9 +2595,20 @@ int i40e_vsi_add_vlan(struct i40e_vsi *vsi, u16 vid)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
int err;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if (!vid || vsi->info.pvid)
|
|
|
+ if (vsi->info.pvid)
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /* The network stack will attempt to add VID=0, with the intention to
|
|
|
+ * receive priority tagged packets with a VLAN of 0. Our HW receives
|
|
|
+ * these packets by default when configured to receive untagged
|
|
|
+ * packets, so we don't need to add a filter for this case.
|
|
|
+ * Additionally, HW interprets adding a VID=0 filter as meaning to
|
|
|
+ * receive *only* tagged traffic and stops receiving untagged traffic.
|
|
|
+ * Thus, we do not want to actually add a filter for VID=0
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (!vid)
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
/* Locked once because all functions invoked below iterates list*/
|
|
|
spin_lock_bh(&vsi->mac_filter_hash_lock);
|
|
|
err = i40e_add_vlan_all_mac(vsi, vid);
|
|
@@ -2674,15 +2685,7 @@ static int i40e_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *netdev,
|
|
|
if (vid >= VLAN_N_VID)
|
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* If the network stack called us with vid = 0 then
|
|
|
- * it is asking to receive priority tagged packets with
|
|
|
- * vlan id 0. Our HW receives them by default when configured
|
|
|
- * to receive untagged packets so there is no need to add an
|
|
|
- * extra filter for vlan 0 tagged packets.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- if (vid)
|
|
|
- ret = i40e_vsi_add_vlan(vsi, vid);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
+ ret = i40e_vsi_add_vlan(vsi, vid);
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
|
set_bit(vid, vsi->active_vlans);
|
|
|
|