Browse Source

Btrfs: fix filemap_flush call in btrfs_file_release

We should only be flushing on close if the file was flagged as needing
it during truncate.  I broke this with my ordered data vs transaction
commit deadlock fix.

Thanks to Miao Xie for catching this.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Reported-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Chris Mason 11 years ago
parent
commit
f6dc45c7a9
1 changed files with 9 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 9 1
      fs/btrfs/file.c

+ 9 - 1
fs/btrfs/file.c

@@ -1840,7 +1840,15 @@ int btrfs_release_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	if (filp->private_data)
 		btrfs_ioctl_trans_end(filp);
-	filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
+	/*
+	 * ordered_data_close is set by settattr when we are about to truncate
+	 * a file from a non-zero size to a zero size.  This tries to
+	 * flush down new bytes that may have been written if the
+	 * application were using truncate to replace a file in place.
+	 */
+	if (test_and_clear_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORDERED_DATA_CLOSE,
+			       &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags))
+			filemap_flush(inode->i_mapping);
 	return 0;
 }