Browse Source

btrfs: GFP_NOFS does not GFP_HIGHMEM

Masking HIGHMEM out of NOFS does not make sense.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba 9 years ago
parent
commit
e1860a7724
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
  1. 1 1
      fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
  2. 1 1
      fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
  3. 2 2
      fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

+ 1 - 1
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ again:
 	/* cached in the btrfs inode and can be accessed */
 	atomic_add(2, &node->refs);
 
-	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
 	if (ret) {
 		kmem_cache_free(delayed_node_cache, node);
 		return ERR_PTR(ret);

+ 1 - 1
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c

@@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@ int btrfs_insert_fs_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 

+ 2 - 2
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

@@ -4815,7 +4815,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		return NULL;
 	eb->fs_info = fs_info;
 again:
-	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_eb;
 	spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
@@ -4916,7 +4916,7 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	if (uptodate)
 		set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags);
 again:
-	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_eb;