|
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p)
|
|
|
return mem_cgroup_from_css(task_css(p, memory_cgrp_id));
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
+static struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
do {
|
|
|
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
|
|
|
if (unlikely(!memcg))
|
|
|
- break;
|
|
|
+ memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
|
|
|
} while (!css_tryget(&memcg->css));
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
return memcg;
|
|
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task,
|
|
|
|
|
|
p = find_lock_task_mm(task);
|
|
|
if (p) {
|
|
|
- curr = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(p->mm);
|
|
|
+ curr = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(p->mm);
|
|
|
task_unlock(p);
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
/*
|
|
@@ -1489,8 +1489,6 @@ bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task,
|
|
|
css_get(&curr->css);
|
|
|
rcu_read_unlock();
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
- if (!curr)
|
|
|
- return false;
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
* We should check use_hierarchy of "memcg" not "curr". Because checking
|
|
|
* use_hierarchy of "curr" here make this function true if hierarchy is
|
|
@@ -3617,15 +3615,7 @@ __memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **_memcg, int order)
|
|
|
if (!current->mm || current->memcg_kmem_skip_account)
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
|
|
- memcg = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * very rare case described in mem_cgroup_from_task. Unfortunately there
|
|
|
- * isn't much we can do without complicating this too much, and it would
|
|
|
- * be gfp-dependent anyway. Just let it go
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- if (unlikely(!memcg))
|
|
|
- return true;
|
|
|
+ memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg)) {
|
|
|
css_put(&memcg->css);
|