Эх сурвалжийг харах

sfc: Assert filter_sem write locked when required

Based on a patch by Andrew Rybchenko <Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Edward Cree 9 жил өмнө
parent
commit
dd98708cf6

+ 15 - 1
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c

@@ -3735,6 +3735,12 @@ static int efx_ef10_filter_table_probe(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	size_t outlen;
 	int rc;
 
+	if (!efx_rwsem_assert_write_locked(&efx->filter_sem))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (efx->filter_state) /* already probed */
+		return 0;
+
 	table = kzalloc(sizeof(*table), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3846,7 +3852,6 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_table_restore(struct efx_nic *efx)
 		nic_data->must_restore_filters = false;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold efx->filter_sem for write */
 static void efx_ef10_filter_table_remove(struct efx_nic *efx)
 {
 	struct efx_ef10_filter_table *table = efx->filter_state;
@@ -3856,6 +3861,15 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_table_remove(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	int rc;
 
 	efx->filter_state = NULL;
+	/* If we were called without locking, then it's not safe to free
+	 * the table as others might be using it.  So we just WARN, leak
+	 * the memory, and potentially get an inconsistent filter table
+	 * state.
+	 * This should never actually happen.
+	 */
+	if (!efx_rwsem_assert_write_locked(&efx->filter_sem))
+		return;
+
 	if (!table)
 		return;
 

+ 9 - 0
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.h

@@ -274,4 +274,13 @@ static inline void efx_device_detach_sync(struct efx_nic *efx)
 	netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
 }
 
+static inline bool efx_rwsem_assert_write_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(down_read_trylock(sem))) {
+		up_read(sem);
+		return false;
+	}
+	return true;
+}
+
 #endif /* EFX_EFX_H */