Browse Source

netfilter: add and use jump label for xt_tee

Don't bother testing if we need to switch to alternate stack
unless TEE target is used.

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Florian Westphal 10 years ago
parent
commit
dcebd3153e

+ 7 - 0
include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 
 
 
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/static_key.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h>
 #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h>
 
 
 /**
 /**
@@ -280,6 +281,12 @@ void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info);
  */
  */
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, xt_recseq);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, xt_recseq);
 
 
+/* xt_tee_enabled - true if x_tables needs to handle reentrancy
+ *
+ * Enabled if current ip(6)tables ruleset has at least one -j TEE rule.
+ */
+extern struct static_key xt_tee_enabled;
+
 /**
 /**
  * xt_write_recseq_begin - start of a write section
  * xt_write_recseq_begin - start of a write section
  *
  *

+ 2 - 1
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c

@@ -340,7 +340,8 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	 * For recursion via REJECT or SYNPROXY the stack will be clobbered
 	 * For recursion via REJECT or SYNPROXY the stack will be clobbered
 	 * but it is no problem since absolute verdict is issued by these.
 	 * but it is no problem since absolute verdict is issued by these.
 	 */
 	 */
-	jumpstack += private->stacksize * __this_cpu_read(nf_skb_duplicated);
+	if (static_key_false(&xt_tee_enabled))
+		jumpstack += private->stacksize * __this_cpu_read(nf_skb_duplicated);
 
 
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 
 

+ 2 - 1
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c

@@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	 * For recursion via REJECT or SYNPROXY the stack will be clobbered
 	 * For recursion via REJECT or SYNPROXY the stack will be clobbered
 	 * but it is no problem since absolute verdict is issued by these.
 	 * but it is no problem since absolute verdict is issued by these.
 	 */
 	 */
-	jumpstack += private->stacksize * __this_cpu_read(nf_skb_duplicated);
+	if (static_key_false(&xt_tee_enabled))
+		jumpstack += private->stacksize * __this_cpu_read(nf_skb_duplicated);
 
 
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 
 

+ 3 - 0
net/netfilter/x_tables.c

@@ -727,6 +727,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_compat_unlock);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, xt_recseq);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(seqcount_t, xt_recseq);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_recseq);
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_recseq);
 
 
+struct static_key xt_tee_enabled __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_tee_enabled);
+
 static int xt_jumpstack_alloc(struct xt_table_info *i)
 static int xt_jumpstack_alloc(struct xt_table_info *i)
 {
 {
 	unsigned int size;
 	unsigned int size;

+ 2 - 0
net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c

@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static int tee_tg_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
 	} else
 	} else
 		info->priv = NULL;
 		info->priv = NULL;
 
 
+	static_key_slow_inc(&xt_tee_enabled);
 	return 0;
 	return 0;
 }
 }
 
 
@@ -262,6 +263,7 @@ static void tee_tg_destroy(const struct xt_tgdtor_param *par)
 		unregister_netdevice_notifier(&info->priv->notifier);
 		unregister_netdevice_notifier(&info->priv->notifier);
 		kfree(info->priv);
 		kfree(info->priv);
 	}
 	}
+	static_key_slow_dec(&xt_tee_enabled);
 }
 }
 
 
 static struct xt_target tee_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {
 static struct xt_target tee_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {