浏览代码

drm/radeon: Override fpfn for all VRAM placements in radeon_evict_flags

We were accidentally only overriding the first VRAM placement. For BOs
with the RADEON_GEM_NO_CPU_ACCESS flag set,
radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain creates a second VRAM placment with
fpfn == 0. If VRAM is almost full, the first VRAM placement with
fpfn > 0 may not work, but the second one with fpfn == 0 always will
(the BO's current location trivially satisfies it). Because "moving"
the BO to its current location puts it back on the LRU list, this
results in an infinite loop.

Fixes: 2a85aedd117c ("drm/radeon: Try evicting from CPU accessible to
                      inaccessible VRAM first")
Reported-by: Zachary Michaels <zmichaels@oblong.com>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Julien Isorce <jisorce@oblong.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Michel Dänzer 8 年之前
父节点
当前提交
ce4b4f228e
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入2 次删除
  1. 2 2
      drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c

@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ static void radeon_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
 			rbo->placement.num_busy_placement = 0;
 			for (i = 0; i < rbo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
 				if (rbo->placements[i].flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) {
-					if (rbo->placements[0].fpfn < fpfn)
-						rbo->placements[0].fpfn = fpfn;
+					if (rbo->placements[i].fpfn < fpfn)
+						rbo->placements[i].fpfn = fpfn;
 				} else {
 					rbo->placement.busy_placement =
 						&rbo->placements[i];