浏览代码

W1: ds1wm.c msleep for reset

Like the previous w1_io.c reset coments and msleep patch, I don't have the
hardware to verify the change, but I think it is safe.  It also helps to
see a comment like this in the code.  "We'll wait a bit longer just to be
sure." If they are going to calculate delaying 324.9us, but actually delay
500us, why not just give up the CPU and sleep?  This is designed for a
battery powered ARM system, avoiding busywaiting has to be good for
battery life.

I sent a request for testers March 7, 2008 to the Linux kernel mailing
list and two developers who have patches for ds1wm.c, but I didn't get
any respons.

Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@fries.net>
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
David Fries 17 年之前
父节点
当前提交
cadd486cfc
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 3 次插入1 次删除
  1. 3 1
      drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c

+ 3 - 1
drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c

@@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ static int ds1wm_reset(struct ds1wm_data *ds1wm_data)
 	 *     625 us - 60 us - 240 us - 100 ns = 324.9 us
 	 *
 	 * We'll wait a bit longer just to be sure.
+	 * Was udelay(500), but if it is going to busywait the cpu that long,
+	 * might as well come back later.
 	 */
-	udelay(500);
+	msleep(1);
 
 	ds1wm_write_register(ds1wm_data, DS1WM_INT_EN,
 		DS1WM_INTEN_ERBF | DS1WM_INTEN_ETMT | DS1WM_INTEN_EPD |