|
@@ -3817,10 +3817,73 @@ int btrfs_read_buffer(struct extent_buffer *buf, u64 parent_transid)
|
|
|
static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|
|
int read_only)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
+ struct btrfs_super_block *sb = fs_info->super_copy;
|
|
|
+ int ret = 0;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (sb->root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: tree_root level too big: %d > %d\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->root_level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL);
|
|
|
+ ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ if (sb->chunk_root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: chunk_root level too big: %d > %d\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->chunk_root_level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL);
|
|
|
+ ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ if (sb->log_root_level > BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: log_root level too big: %d > %d\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->log_root_level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL);
|
|
|
+ ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
- * Placeholder for checks
|
|
|
+ * The common minimum, we don't know if we can trust the nodesize/sectorsize
|
|
|
+ * items yet, they'll be verified later. Issue just a warning.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- return 0;
|
|
|
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(sb->root, 4096))
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "BTRFS: tree_root block unaligned: %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->root);
|
|
|
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(sb->chunk_root, 4096))
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "BTRFS: tree_root block unaligned: %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->chunk_root);
|
|
|
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(sb->log_root, 4096))
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "BTRFS: tree_root block unaligned: %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->log_root);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (memcmp(fs_info->fsid, sb->dev_item.fsid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE) != 0) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: dev_item UUID does not match fsid: %pU != %pU\n",
|
|
|
+ fs_info->fsid, sb->dev_item.fsid);
|
|
|
+ ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * Hint to catch really bogus numbers, bitflips or so, more exact checks are
|
|
|
+ * done later
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (sb->num_devices > (1UL << 31))
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "BTRFS: suspicious number of devices: %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->num_devices);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (sb->bytenr != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_ERR "BTRFS: super offset mismatch %llu != %u\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->bytenr, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
|
|
|
+ ret = -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * The generation is a global counter, we'll trust it more than the others
|
|
|
+ * but it's still possible that it's the one that's wrong.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (sb->generation < sb->chunk_root_generation)
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
|
|
|
+ "BTRFS: suspicious: generation < chunk_root_generation: %llu < %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->generation, sb->chunk_root_generation);
|
|
|
+ if (sb->generation < sb->cache_generation && sb->cache_generation != (u64)-1)
|
|
|
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
|
|
|
+ "BTRFS: suspicious: generation < cache_generation: %llu < %llu\n",
|
|
|
+ sb->generation, sb->cache_generation);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ return ret;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void btrfs_error_commit_super(struct btrfs_root *root)
|