|
@@ -736,8 +736,8 @@ static void process_txdone_queue (struct fs_dev *dev, struct queue *q)
|
|
|
|
|
|
skb = td->skb;
|
|
skb = td->skb;
|
|
if (skb == FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->last_skb) {
|
|
if (skb == FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->last_skb) {
|
|
- wake_up_interruptible (& FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->close_wait);
|
|
|
|
FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->last_skb = NULL;
|
|
FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->last_skb = NULL;
|
|
|
|
+ wake_up_interruptible (& FS_VCC (ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc)->close_wait);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
td->dev->ntxpckts--;
|
|
td->dev->ntxpckts--;
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static void fs_close(struct atm_vcc *atm_vcc)
|
|
this sleep_on, we'll lose any reference to these packets. Memory leak!
|
|
this sleep_on, we'll lose any reference to these packets. Memory leak!
|
|
On the other hand, it's awfully convenient that we can abort a "close" that
|
|
On the other hand, it's awfully convenient that we can abort a "close" that
|
|
is taking too long. Maybe just use non-interruptible sleep on? -- REW */
|
|
is taking too long. Maybe just use non-interruptible sleep on? -- REW */
|
|
- interruptible_sleep_on (& vcc->close_wait);
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ wait_event_interruptible(vcc->close_wait, !vcc->last_skb);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
txtp = &atm_vcc->qos.txtp;
|
|
txtp = &atm_vcc->qos.txtp;
|