|
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
/**************************************************************************
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Copyright 2006 Tungsten Graphics, Inc., Bismarck, ND., USA.
|
|
|
+ * Copyright 2016 Intel Corporation
|
|
|
* All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
|
|
@@ -31,9 +32,9 @@
|
|
|
* class implementation for more advanced memory managers.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Note that the algorithm used is quite simple and there might be substantial
|
|
|
- * performance gains if a smarter free list is implemented. Currently it is just an
|
|
|
- * unordered stack of free regions. This could easily be improved if an RB-tree
|
|
|
- * is used instead. At least if we expect heavy fragmentation.
|
|
|
+ * performance gains if a smarter free list is implemented. Currently it is
|
|
|
+ * just an unordered stack of free regions. This could easily be improved if
|
|
|
+ * an RB-tree is used instead. At least if we expect heavy fragmentation.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Aligned allocations can also see improvement.
|
|
|
*
|
|
@@ -67,7 +68,7 @@
|
|
|
* where an object needs to be created which exactly matches the firmware's
|
|
|
* scanout target. As long as the range is still free it can be inserted anytime
|
|
|
* after the allocator is initialized, which helps with avoiding looped
|
|
|
- * depencies in the driver load sequence.
|
|
|
+ * dependencies in the driver load sequence.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* drm_mm maintains a stack of most recently freed holes, which of all
|
|
|
* simplistic datastructures seems to be a fairly decent approach to clustering
|
|
@@ -78,14 +79,14 @@
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* drm_mm supports a few features: Alignment and range restrictions can be
|
|
|
* supplied. Further more every &drm_mm_node has a color value (which is just an
|
|
|
- * opaqua unsigned long) which in conjunction with a driver callback can be used
|
|
|
+ * opaque unsigned long) which in conjunction with a driver callback can be used
|
|
|
* to implement sophisticated placement restrictions. The i915 DRM driver uses
|
|
|
* this to implement guard pages between incompatible caching domains in the
|
|
|
* graphics TT.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * Two behaviors are supported for searching and allocating: bottom-up and top-down.
|
|
|
- * The default is bottom-up. Top-down allocation can be used if the memory area
|
|
|
- * has different restrictions, or just to reduce fragmentation.
|
|
|
+ * Two behaviors are supported for searching and allocating: bottom-up and
|
|
|
+ * top-down. The default is bottom-up. Top-down allocation can be used if the
|
|
|
+ * memory area has different restrictions, or just to reduce fragmentation.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Finally iteration helpers to walk all nodes and all holes are provided as are
|
|
|
* some basic allocator dumpers for debugging.
|
|
@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mm_insert_node_in_range_generic);
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* This just removes a node from its drm_mm allocator. The node does not need to
|
|
|
* be cleared again before it can be re-inserted into this or any other drm_mm
|
|
|
- * allocator. It is a bug to call this function on a un-allocated node.
|
|
|
+ * allocator. It is a bug to call this function on a unallocated node.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
void drm_mm_remove_node(struct drm_mm_node *node)
|
|
|
{
|
|
@@ -689,16 +690,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mm_replace_node);
|
|
|
* efficient when we simply start to select all objects from the tail of an LRU
|
|
|
* until there's a suitable hole: Especially for big objects or nodes that
|
|
|
* otherwise have special allocation constraints there's a good chance we evict
|
|
|
- * lots of (smaller) objects unecessarily.
|
|
|
+ * lots of (smaller) objects unnecessarily.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* The DRM range allocator supports this use-case through the scanning
|
|
|
* interfaces. First a scan operation needs to be initialized with
|
|
|
- * drm_mm_init_scan() or drm_mm_init_scan_with_range(). The the driver adds
|
|
|
+ * drm_mm_init_scan() or drm_mm_init_scan_with_range(). The driver adds
|
|
|
* objects to the roaster (probably by walking an LRU list, but this can be
|
|
|
* freely implemented) until a suitable hole is found or there's no further
|
|
|
- * evitable object.
|
|
|
+ * evictable object.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * The the driver must walk through all objects again in exactly the reverse
|
|
|
+ * The driver must walk through all objects again in exactly the reverse
|
|
|
* order to restore the allocator state. Note that while the allocator is used
|
|
|
* in the scan mode no other operation is allowed.
|
|
|
*
|
|
@@ -838,9 +839,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mm_scan_add_block);
|
|
|
* drm_mm_scan_remove_block - remove a node from the scan list
|
|
|
* @node: drm_mm_node to remove
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
- * Nodes _must_ be removed in the exact same order from the scan list as they
|
|
|
- * have been added, otherwise the internal state of the memory manager will be
|
|
|
- * corrupted.
|
|
|
+ * Nodes _must_ be removed in exactly the reverse order from the scan list as
|
|
|
+ * they have been added (e.g. using list_add as they are added and then
|
|
|
+ * list_for_each over that eviction list to remove), otherwise the internal
|
|
|
+ * state of the memory manager will be corrupted.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* When the scan list is empty, the selected memory nodes can be freed. An
|
|
|
* immediately following drm_mm_search_free with !DRM_MM_SEARCH_BEST will then
|