ソースを参照

xfrm: policy: only use rcu in xfrm_sk_policy_lookup

Don't acquire the readlock anymore and rely on rcu alone.

In case writer on other CPU changed policy at the wrong moment (after we
obtained sk policy pointer but before we could obtain the reference)
just repeat the lookup.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Florian Westphal 9 年 前
コミット
ae33786f73
1 ファイル変更3 行追加5 行削除
  1. 3 5
      net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

+ 3 - 5
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c

@@ -1249,10 +1249,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 						 const struct flowi *fl)
 						 const struct flowi *fl)
 {
 {
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
 	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
-	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	rcu_read_lock();
-	read_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
+ again:
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	if (pol != NULL) {
 	if (pol != NULL) {
 		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
 		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
@@ -1267,8 +1266,8 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 			err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol->security,
 			err = security_xfrm_policy_lookup(pol->security,
 						      fl->flowi_secid,
 						      fl->flowi_secid,
 						      policy_to_flow_dir(dir));
 						      policy_to_flow_dir(dir));
-			if (!err)
-				xfrm_pol_hold(pol);
+			if (!err && !xfrm_pol_hold_rcu(pol))
+				goto again;
 			else if (err == -ESRCH)
 			else if (err == -ESRCH)
 				pol = NULL;
 				pol = NULL;
 			else
 			else
@@ -1277,7 +1276,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(const struct sock *sk, int dir,
 			pol = NULL;
 			pol = NULL;
 	}
 	}
 out:
 out:
-	read_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return pol;
 	return pol;
 }
 }