|
@@ -1,137 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
-Paravirt_ops on IA64
|
|
|
-====================
|
|
|
- 21 May 2008, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Introduction
|
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
-The aim of this documentation is to help with maintainability and/or to
|
|
|
-encourage people to use paravirt_ops/IA64.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-paravirt_ops (pv_ops in short) is a way for virtualization support of
|
|
|
-Linux kernel on x86. Several ways for virtualization support were
|
|
|
-proposed, paravirt_ops is the winner.
|
|
|
-On the other hand, now there are also several IA64 virtualization
|
|
|
-technologies like kvm/IA64, xen/IA64 and many other academic IA64
|
|
|
-hypervisors so that it is good to add generic virtualization
|
|
|
-infrastructure on Linux/IA64.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-What is paravirt_ops?
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
-It has been developed on x86 as virtualization support via API, not ABI.
|
|
|
-It allows each hypervisor to override operations which are important for
|
|
|
-hypervisors at API level. And it allows a single kernel binary to run on
|
|
|
-all supported execution environments including native machine.
|
|
|
-Essentially paravirt_ops is a set of function pointers which represent
|
|
|
-operations corresponding to low level sensitive instructions and high
|
|
|
-level functionalities in various area. But one significant difference
|
|
|
-from usual function pointer table is that it allows optimization with
|
|
|
-binary patch. It is because some of these operations are very
|
|
|
-performance sensitive and indirect call overhead is not negligible.
|
|
|
-With binary patch, indirect C function call can be transformed into
|
|
|
-direct C function call or in-place execution to eliminate the overhead.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Thus, operations of paravirt_ops are classified into three categories.
|
|
|
-- simple indirect call
|
|
|
- These operations correspond to high level functionality so that the
|
|
|
- overhead of indirect call isn't very important.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- indirect call which allows optimization with binary patch
|
|
|
- Usually these operations correspond to low level instructions. They
|
|
|
- are called frequently and performance critical. So the overhead is
|
|
|
- very important.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- a set of macros for hand written assembly code
|
|
|
- Hand written assembly codes (.S files) also need paravirtualization
|
|
|
- because they include sensitive instructions or some of code paths in
|
|
|
- them are very performance critical.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-The relation to the IA64 machine vector
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
-Linux/IA64 has the IA64 machine vector functionality which allows the
|
|
|
-kernel to switch implementations (e.g. initialization, ipi, dma api...)
|
|
|
-depending on executing platform.
|
|
|
-We can replace some implementations very easily defining a new machine
|
|
|
-vector. Thus another approach for virtualization support would be
|
|
|
-enhancing the machine vector functionality.
|
|
|
-But paravirt_ops approach was taken because
|
|
|
-- virtualization support needs wider support than machine vector does.
|
|
|
- e.g. low level instruction paravirtualization. It must be
|
|
|
- initialized very early before platform detection.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- virtualization support needs more functionality like binary patch.
|
|
|
- Probably the calling overhead might not be very large compared to the
|
|
|
- emulation overhead of virtualization. However in the native case, the
|
|
|
- overhead should be eliminated completely.
|
|
|
- A single kernel binary should run on each environment including native,
|
|
|
- and the overhead of paravirt_ops on native environment should be as
|
|
|
- small as possible.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- for full virtualization technology, e.g. KVM/IA64 or
|
|
|
- Xen/IA64 HVM domain, the result would be
|
|
|
- (the emulated platform machine vector. probably dig) + (pv_ops).
|
|
|
- This means that the virtualization support layer should be under
|
|
|
- the machine vector layer.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Possibly it might be better to move some function pointers from
|
|
|
-paravirt_ops to machine vector. In fact, Xen domU case utilizes both
|
|
|
-pv_ops and machine vector.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-IA64 paravirt_ops
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
-In this section, the concrete paravirt_ops will be discussed.
|
|
|
-Because of the architecture difference between ia64 and x86, the
|
|
|
-resulting set of functions is very different from x86 pv_ops.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- C function pointer tables
|
|
|
-They are not very performance critical so that simple C indirect
|
|
|
-function call is acceptable. The following structures are defined at
|
|
|
-this moment. For details see linux/include/asm-ia64/paravirt.h
|
|
|
- - struct pv_info
|
|
|
- This structure describes the execution environment.
|
|
|
- - struct pv_init_ops
|
|
|
- This structure describes the various initialization hooks.
|
|
|
- - struct pv_iosapic_ops
|
|
|
- This structure describes hooks to iosapic operations.
|
|
|
- - struct pv_irq_ops
|
|
|
- This structure describes hooks to irq related operations
|
|
|
- - struct pv_time_op
|
|
|
- This structure describes hooks to steal time accounting.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- a set of indirect calls which need optimization
|
|
|
-Currently this class of functions correspond to a subset of IA64
|
|
|
-intrinsics. At this moment the optimization with binary patch isn't
|
|
|
-implemented yet.
|
|
|
-struct pv_cpu_op is defined. For details see
|
|
|
-linux/include/asm-ia64/paravirt_privop.h
|
|
|
-Mostly they correspond to ia64 intrinsics 1-to-1.
|
|
|
-Caveat: Now they are defined as C indirect function pointers, but in
|
|
|
-order to support binary patch optimization, they will be changed
|
|
|
-using GCC extended inline assembly code.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-- a set of macros for hand written assembly code (.S files)
|
|
|
-For maintenance purpose, the taken approach for .S files is single
|
|
|
-source code and compile multiple times with different macros definitions.
|
|
|
-Each pv_ops instance must define those macros to compile.
|
|
|
-The important thing here is that sensitive, but non-privileged
|
|
|
-instructions must be paravirtualized and that some privileged
|
|
|
-instructions also need paravirtualization for reasonable performance.
|
|
|
-Developers who modify .S files must be aware of that. At this moment
|
|
|
-an easy checker is implemented to detect paravirtualization breakage.
|
|
|
-But it doesn't cover all the cases.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Sometimes this set of macros is called pv_cpu_asm_op. But there is no
|
|
|
-corresponding structure in the source code.
|
|
|
-Those macros mostly 1:1 correspond to a subset of privileged
|
|
|
-instructions. See linux/include/asm-ia64/native/inst.h.
|
|
|
-And some functions written in assembly also need to be overrided so
|
|
|
-that each pv_ops instance have to define some macros. Again see
|
|
|
-linux/include/asm-ia64/native/inst.h.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Those structures must be initialized very early before start_kernel.
|
|
|
-Probably initialized in head.S using multi entry point or some other trick.
|
|
|
-For native case implementation see linux/arch/ia64/kernel/paravirt.c.
|