|
@@ -1051,13 +1051,15 @@ out_force:
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* If LOOKUP_RCU prevents us from performing a full check, return 1
|
|
|
* suggesting a reval is needed.
|
|
|
+ *
|
|
|
+ * Note that when creating a new file, or looking up a rename target,
|
|
|
+ * then it shouldn't be necessary to revalidate a negative dentry.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
static inline
|
|
|
int nfs_neg_need_reval(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
|
|
|
unsigned int flags)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
- /* Don't revalidate a negative dentry if we're creating a new file */
|
|
|
- if (flags & LOOKUP_CREATE)
|
|
|
+ if (flags & (LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET))
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
if (NFS_SERVER(dir)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_LOOKUP_CACHE_NONEG)
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
@@ -1347,7 +1349,7 @@ struct dentry *nfs_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry * dentry, unsigned in
|
|
|
* If we're doing an exclusive create, optimize away the lookup
|
|
|
* but don't hash the dentry.
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
- if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags))
|
|
|
+ if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags) || flags & LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET)
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
res = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|