|
@@ -437,13 +437,45 @@ static int vlv_calc_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int min_cdclk)
|
|
|
return 200000;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
+static u8 vlv_calc_voltage_level(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk)
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
+ if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
|
|
|
+ if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
|
|
|
+ return 2;
|
|
|
+ else if (cdclk >= 266667)
|
|
|
+ return 1;
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
+ return 0;
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
|
|
|
+ * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
|
|
|
+ * CCK divider into the Punit register.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
static void vlv_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
+ u32 val;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
cdclk_state->vco = vlv_get_hpll_vco(dev_priv);
|
|
|
cdclk_state->cdclk = vlv_get_cck_clock(dev_priv, "cdclk",
|
|
|
CCK_DISPLAY_CLOCK_CONTROL,
|
|
|
cdclk_state->vco);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
|
|
|
+ val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
|
|
|
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
|
|
|
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK) >>
|
|
|
+ DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT;
|
|
|
+ else
|
|
|
+ cdclk_state->voltage_level = (val & DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV) >>
|
|
|
+ DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV;
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void vlv_program_pfi_credits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
|
@@ -486,7 +518,7 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
|
|
|
- u32 val, cmd;
|
|
|
+ u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* There are cases where we can end up here with power domains
|
|
|
* off and a CDCLK frequency other than the minimum, like when
|
|
@@ -496,13 +528,6 @@ static void vlv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- if (cdclk >= 320000) /* jump to highest voltage for 400MHz too */
|
|
|
- cmd = 2;
|
|
|
- else if (cdclk == 266667)
|
|
|
- cmd = 1;
|
|
|
- else
|
|
|
- cmd = 0;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
|
|
|
val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
|
|
|
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
|
|
@@ -562,7 +587,7 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
const struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
|
|
|
- u32 val, cmd;
|
|
|
+ u32 val, cmd = cdclk_state->voltage_level;
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (cdclk) {
|
|
|
case 333333:
|
|
@@ -583,13 +608,6 @@ static void chv_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
intel_display_power_get(dev_priv, POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A);
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /*
|
|
|
- * Specs are full of misinformation, but testing on actual
|
|
|
- * hardware has shown that we just need to write the desired
|
|
|
- * CCK divider into the Punit register.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
- cmd = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
|
|
|
val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
|
|
|
val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
|
|
@@ -1859,11 +1877,15 @@ static int vlv_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
|
|
|
cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, min_cdclk);
|
|
|
|
|
|
intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
|
|
|
+ intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage_level =
|
|
|
+ vlv_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv, cdclk);
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
|
|
|
cdclk = vlv_calc_cdclk(dev_priv, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
|
|
|
+ intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage_level =
|
|
|
+ vlv_calc_voltage_level(dev_priv, cdclk);
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
intel_state->cdclk.actual =
|
|
|
intel_state->cdclk.logical;
|