|
@@ -423,17 +423,13 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_
|
|
iommu->pasid_table[svm->pasid].val = pasid_entry_val;
|
|
iommu->pasid_table[svm->pasid].val = pasid_entry_val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
wmb();
|
|
wmb();
|
|
- /* In caching mode, we still have to flush with PASID 0 when
|
|
|
|
- * a PASID table entry becomes present. Not entirely clear
|
|
|
|
- * *why* that would be the case — surely we could just issue
|
|
|
|
- * a flush with the PASID value that we've changed? The PASID
|
|
|
|
- * is the index into the table, after all. It's not like domain
|
|
|
|
- * IDs in the case of the equivalent context-entry change in
|
|
|
|
- * caching mode. And for that matter it's not entirely clear why
|
|
|
|
- * a VMM would be in the business of caching the PASID table
|
|
|
|
- * anyway. Surely that can be left entirely to the guest? */
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
|
+ * Flush PASID cache when a PASID table entry becomes
|
|
|
|
+ * present.
|
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap))
|
|
if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap))
|
|
- intel_flush_pasid_dev(svm, sdev, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ intel_flush_pasid_dev(svm, sdev, svm->pasid);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs);
|
|
list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs);
|
|
|
|
|