浏览代码

tools/liblockdep: Fix debug_check thinko in mutex destroy

In mutex destroy code currently we pass to debug_check_no_locks_freed()

    [mem_from, mem_end)

address region. But debug_check_no_locks_freed() accepts

    mem_from, mem_*len*

i.e. second parameter is region length, not end address. And it was
always so, starting from 2006 (fbb9ce95 "lockdep: core").

Fix it, or else on a mutex destroy we wrongly check
much-wider-than-mutex region and can find not-yet-released other locks
there and wrongly report BUGs on them.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@nexedi.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Kirill Smelkov 10 年之前
父节点
当前提交
95bfdf23e4
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入2 次删除
  1. 2 2
      tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c

+ 2 - 2
tools/lib/lockdep/preload.c

@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int pthread_mutex_destroy(pthread_mutex_t *mutex)
 	 *
 	 * TODO: Hook into free() and add that check there as well.
 	 */
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, mutex + sizeof(*mutex));
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed(mutex, sizeof(*mutex));
 	__del_lock(__get_lock(mutex));
 	return ll_pthread_mutex_destroy(mutex);
 }
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ int pthread_rwlock_destroy(pthread_rwlock_t *rwlock)
 {
 	try_init_preload();
 
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, rwlock + sizeof(*rwlock));
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed(rwlock, sizeof(*rwlock));
 	__del_lock(__get_lock(rwlock));
 	return ll_pthread_rwlock_destroy(rwlock);
 }