Browse Source

nohz: Get timekeeping max deferment outside jiffies_lock

We don't need to fetch the timekeeping max deferment under the
jiffies_lock seqlock.

If the clocksource is updated concurrently while we stop the tick,
stop machine is called and the tick will be reevaluated again along with
uptodate jiffies and its related values.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387320692-28460-9-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Frederic Weisbecker 11 years ago
parent
commit
855a0fc30b
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 2 1
      kernel/time/tick-sched.c

+ 2 - 1
kernel/time/tick-sched.c

@@ -533,12 +533,13 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
 	struct clock_event_device *dev = __get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_device).evtdev;
 	u64 time_delta;
 
+	time_delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
+
 	/* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */
 	do {
 		seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock);
 		last_update = last_jiffies_update;
 		last_jiffies = jiffies;
-		time_delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
 	} while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq));
 
 	if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu, &rcu_delta_jiffies) ||