瀏覽代碼

usermodehelper: kill the sub_info->path[0] check

call_usermodehelper_exec() does nothing but returns success if path[0] ==
0.  The only user which needs this strange feature is request_module(), it
can check modprobe_path[0] itself like other users do if they want to
detect the "disabled by admin" case.

Kill it.  Not only it looks strange, it can confuse other callers.  And
this allows us to revert 264b83c0 ("usermodehelper: check
subprocess_info->path != NULL"), do_execve(NULL) is safe.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Oleg Nesterov 12 年之前
父節點
當前提交
7f57cfa4e2
共有 1 個文件被更改,包括 3 次插入8 次删除
  1. 3 8
      kernel/kmod.c

+ 3 - 8
kernel/kmod.c

@@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
 	 */
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(wait && current_is_async());
 
+	if (!modprobe_path[0])
+		return 0;
+
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 	ret = vsnprintf(module_name, MODULE_NAME_LEN, fmt, args);
 	va_end(args);
@@ -569,14 +572,6 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subprocess_info *sub_info, int wait)
 	int retval = 0;
 
 	helper_lock();
-	if (!sub_info->path) {
-		retval = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (sub_info->path[0] == '\0')
-		goto out;
-
 	if (!khelper_wq || usermodehelper_disabled) {
 		retval = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;