|
@@ -1627,8 +1627,9 @@ do_rename_exit:
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
|
-cifs_rename(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
|
|
|
- struct inode *target_dir, struct dentry *target_dentry)
|
|
|
+cifs_rename2(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
|
|
|
+ struct inode *target_dir, struct dentry *target_dentry,
|
|
|
+ unsigned int flags)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
char *from_name = NULL;
|
|
|
char *to_name = NULL;
|
|
@@ -1640,6 +1641,9 @@ cifs_rename(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
|
|
|
unsigned int xid;
|
|
|
int rc, tmprc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ if (flags & ~RENAME_NOREPLACE)
|
|
|
+ return -EINVAL;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(source_dir->i_sb);
|
|
|
tlink = cifs_sb_tlink(cifs_sb);
|
|
|
if (IS_ERR(tlink))
|
|
@@ -1667,6 +1671,12 @@ cifs_rename(struct inode *source_dir, struct dentry *source_dentry,
|
|
|
rc = cifs_do_rename(xid, source_dentry, from_name, target_dentry,
|
|
|
to_name);
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ /*
|
|
|
+ * No-replace is the natural behavior for CIFS, so skip unlink hacks.
|
|
|
+ */
|
|
|
+ if (flags & RENAME_NOREPLACE)
|
|
|
+ goto cifs_rename_exit;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
if (rc == -EEXIST && tcon->unix_ext) {
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
* Are src and dst hardlinks of same inode? We can only tell
|