Browse Source

btrfs: remove extra barrier before waitqueue_active

Removing barriers is scary, but a call to atomic_dec_and_test implies
a barrier, so we don't need to issue another one.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba 10 years ago
parent
commit
779adf0f64
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
  1. 6 2
      fs/btrfs/tree-log.c

+ 6 - 2
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c

@@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ int btrfs_pin_log_trans(struct btrfs_root *root)
 void btrfs_end_log_trans(struct btrfs_root *root)
 {
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&root->log_writers)) {
-		smp_mb();
+		/*
+		 * Implicit memory barrier after atomic_dec_and_test
+		 */
 		if (waitqueue_active(&root->log_writer_wait))
 			wake_up(&root->log_writer_wait);
 	}
@@ -2820,7 +2822,9 @@ int btrfs_sync_log(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	mutex_lock(&log_root_tree->log_mutex);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&log_root_tree->log_writers)) {
-		smp_mb();
+		/*
+		 * Implicit memory barrier after atomic_dec_and_test
+		 */
 		if (waitqueue_active(&log_root_tree->log_writer_wait))
 			wake_up(&log_root_tree->log_writer_wait);
 	}