|
@@ -0,0 +1,2040 @@
|
|
|
+================
|
|
|
+Control Group v2
|
|
|
+================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+:Date: October, 2015
|
|
|
+:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
|
|
|
+conventions of cgroup v2. It describes all userland-visible aspects
|
|
|
+of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors. All
|
|
|
+future changes must be reflected in this document. Documentation for
|
|
|
+v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+.. CONTENTS
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ 1. Introduction
|
|
|
+ 1-1. Terminology
|
|
|
+ 1-2. What is cgroup?
|
|
|
+ 2. Basic Operations
|
|
|
+ 2-1. Mounting
|
|
|
+ 2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
|
|
|
+ 2-2-1. Processes
|
|
|
+ 2-2-2. Threads
|
|
|
+ 2-3. [Un]populated Notification
|
|
|
+ 2-4. Controlling Controllers
|
|
|
+ 2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
|
|
|
+ 2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
|
|
|
+ 2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
|
|
|
+ 2-5. Delegation
|
|
|
+ 2-5-1. Model of Delegation
|
|
|
+ 2-5-2. Delegation Containment
|
|
|
+ 2-6. Guidelines
|
|
|
+ 2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
|
|
|
+ 2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
|
|
|
+ 3. Resource Distribution Models
|
|
|
+ 3-1. Weights
|
|
|
+ 3-2. Limits
|
|
|
+ 3-3. Protections
|
|
|
+ 3-4. Allocations
|
|
|
+ 4. Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 4-1. Format
|
|
|
+ 4-2. Conventions
|
|
|
+ 4-3. Core Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5. Controllers
|
|
|
+ 5-1. CPU
|
|
|
+ 5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5-2. Memory
|
|
|
+ 5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
|
|
|
+ 5-2-3. Memory Ownership
|
|
|
+ 5-3. IO
|
|
|
+ 5-3-1. IO Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5-3-2. Writeback
|
|
|
+ 5-4. PID
|
|
|
+ 5-4-1. PID Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5-5. Device
|
|
|
+ 5-6. RDMA
|
|
|
+ 5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
|
|
|
+ 5-7. Misc
|
|
|
+ 5-7-1. perf_event
|
|
|
+ 5-N. Non-normative information
|
|
|
+ 5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
|
|
|
+ 5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
|
|
|
+ 6. Namespace
|
|
|
+ 6-1. Basics
|
|
|
+ 6-2. The Root and Views
|
|
|
+ 6-3. Migration and setns(2)
|
|
|
+ 6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
|
|
|
+ P. Information on Kernel Programming
|
|
|
+ P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
|
|
|
+ D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
|
|
|
+ R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
|
|
|
+ R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
|
|
|
+ R-2. Thread Granularity
|
|
|
+ R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
|
|
|
+ R-4. Other Interface Issues
|
|
|
+ R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
|
|
|
+ R-5-1. Memory
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Introduction
|
|
|
+============
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Terminology
|
|
|
+-----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized. The
|
|
|
+singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
|
|
|
+qualifier as in "cgroup controllers". When explicitly referring to
|
|
|
+multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+What is cgroup?
|
|
|
+---------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
|
|
|
+distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
|
|
|
+configurable manner.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
|
|
|
+cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
|
|
|
+processes. A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
|
|
|
+distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
|
|
|
+although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
|
|
|
+resource distribution.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
|
|
|
+to one and only one cgroup. All threads of a process belong to the
|
|
|
+same cgroup. On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
|
|
|
+the parent process belongs to at the time. A process can be migrated
|
|
|
+to another cgroup. Migration of a process doesn't affect already
|
|
|
+existing descendant processes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
|
|
|
+disabled selectively on a cgroup. All controller behaviors are
|
|
|
+hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
|
|
|
+processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
|
|
|
+sub-hierarchy of the cgroup. When a controller is enabled on a nested
|
|
|
+cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further. The
|
|
|
+restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
|
|
|
+overridden from further away.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Basic Operations
|
|
|
+================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Mounting
|
|
|
+--------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy. The cgroup v2
|
|
|
+hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp"). All
|
|
|
+controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
|
|
|
+automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
|
|
|
+Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
|
|
|
+bound to other hierarchies. This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
|
|
|
+legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
|
|
|
+is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy. Because per-cgroup
|
|
|
+controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
|
|
|
+have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
|
|
|
+the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
|
|
|
+Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
|
|
|
+the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
|
|
|
+controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
|
|
|
+to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
|
|
|
+disabled too.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
|
|
|
+controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
|
|
|
+strongly discouraged for production use. It is recommended to decide
|
|
|
+the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
|
|
|
+controllers after system boot.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+During transition to v2, system management software might still
|
|
|
+automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
|
|
|
+during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
|
|
|
+and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
|
|
|
+disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ nsdelegate
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries. This
|
|
|
+ option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
|
|
|
+ through remount from the init namespace. The mount option is
|
|
|
+ ignored on non-init namespace mounts. Please refer to the
|
|
|
+ Delegation section for details.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Organizing Processes and Threads
|
|
|
+--------------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Processes
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
|
|
|
+A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
|
|
|
+structure. Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
|
|
|
+"cgroup.procs". When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
|
|
|
+belong to the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
|
|
|
+same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
|
|
|
+another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
|
|
|
+target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file. Only one process can be migrated
|
|
|
+on a single write(2) call. If a process is composed of multiple
|
|
|
+threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
|
|
|
+process.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
|
|
|
+cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
|
|
|
+operation. After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
|
|
|
+that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
|
|
|
+zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
|
|
|
+moved to another cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
|
|
|
+destroyed by removing the directory. Note that a cgroup which doesn't
|
|
|
+have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
|
|
|
+considered empty and can be removed::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership. If legacy
|
|
|
+cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
|
|
|
+one for each hierarchy. The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
|
|
|
+format "0::$PATH"::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/842/cgroup
|
|
|
+ ...
|
|
|
+ 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
|
|
|
+is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/842/cgroup
|
|
|
+ ...
|
|
|
+ 0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Threads
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
|
|
|
+support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
|
|
|
+the threads of a group of processes. By default, all threads of a
|
|
|
+process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
|
|
|
+domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
|
|
|
+process or thread. The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
|
|
|
+a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
|
|
|
+The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
|
|
|
+parent as a threaded cgroup. The parent may be another threaded
|
|
|
+cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy. The root
|
|
|
+of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
|
|
|
+threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
|
|
|
+serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
|
|
|
+different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
|
|
|
+constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
|
|
|
+whether they have threads in them or not.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
|
|
|
+consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
|
|
|
+resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
|
|
|
+can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded. Because the
|
|
|
+root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
|
|
|
+serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
|
|
|
+"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
|
|
|
+domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
|
|
|
+or a threaded cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
|
|
|
+threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file. The
|
|
|
+operation is single direction::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo threaded > cgroup.type
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again. To enable the
|
|
|
+thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain. The parent
|
|
|
+ must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
|
|
|
+ controllers enabled or populated domain children. The root is
|
|
|
+ exempt from this requirement.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state. Please consider
|
|
|
+the following topology::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
|
|
|
+host child domains. C can't be used until it is turned into a
|
|
|
+threaded cgroup. "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
|
|
|
+these cases. Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
|
|
|
+EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
|
|
|
+cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
|
|
|
+"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
|
|
|
+A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
|
|
|
+clear.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
|
|
|
+threads in the cgroup. Except that the operations are per-thread
|
|
|
+instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
|
|
|
+behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs". While "cgroup.threads" can be
|
|
|
+written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
|
|
|
+threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
|
|
|
+subtree.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
|
|
|
+subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
|
|
|
+all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
|
|
|
+"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
|
|
|
+processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
|
|
|
+However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
|
|
|
+to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree. When
|
|
|
+a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
|
|
|
+accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
|
|
|
+threads in the cgroup and its descendants. All consumptions which
|
|
|
+aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
|
|
|
+constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
|
|
|
+between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups. Each
|
|
|
+threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+[Un]populated Notification
|
|
|
+--------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
|
|
|
+"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
|
|
|
+live processes in it. Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
|
|
|
+the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1. poll and [id]notify
|
|
|
+events are triggered when the value changes. This can be used, for
|
|
|
+example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
|
|
|
+sub-hierarchy have exited. The populated state updates and
|
|
|
+notifications are recursive. Consider the following sub-hierarchy
|
|
|
+where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
|
|
|
+in each cgroup::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
|
|
|
+ \ D(0)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0. After the one
|
|
|
+process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
|
|
|
+file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
|
|
|
+both cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Controlling Controllers
|
|
|
+-----------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Enabling and Disabling
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
|
|
|
+controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat cgroup.controllers
|
|
|
+ cpu io memory
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+No controller is enabled by default. Controllers can be enabled and
|
|
|
+disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
|
|
|
+enabled. When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
|
|
|
+all succeed or fail. If multiple operations on the same controller
|
|
|
+are specified, the last one is effective.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
|
|
|
+the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
|
|
|
+Consider the following sub-hierarchy. The enabled controllers are
|
|
|
+listed in parentheses::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
|
|
|
+ \ D()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
|
|
|
+of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B. As B has
|
|
|
+"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
|
|
|
+cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
|
|
|
+the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
|
|
|
+files in the child cgroups. In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
|
|
|
+would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
|
|
|
+D. Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
|
|
|
+prefixed controller interface files from C and D. This means that the
|
|
|
+controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
|
|
|
+"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Top-down Constraint
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
|
|
|
+a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
|
|
|
+parent. This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
|
|
|
+can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
|
|
|
+"cgroup.subtree_control" file. A controller can be enabled only if
|
|
|
+the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
|
|
|
+disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+No Internal Process Constraint
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
|
|
|
+only when they don't have any processes of their own. In other words,
|
|
|
+only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
|
|
|
+controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
|
|
|
+of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
|
|
|
+the leaves. This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
|
|
|
+against internal processes of the parent.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction. Root contains
|
|
|
+processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
|
|
|
+with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
|
|
|
+controllers. How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
|
|
|
+is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
|
|
|
+refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
|
|
|
+chapter).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
|
|
|
+enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control". This is
|
|
|
+important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
|
|
|
+populated cgroup. To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
|
|
|
+cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
|
|
|
+children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
|
|
|
+file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Delegation
|
|
|
+----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Model of Delegation
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A cgroup can be delegated in two ways. First, to a less privileged
|
|
|
+user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
|
|
|
+"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
|
|
|
+Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
|
|
|
+cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
|
|
|
+control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
|
|
|
+shouldn't be allowed to write to them. For the first method, this is
|
|
|
+achieved by not granting access to these files. For the second, the
|
|
|
+kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
|
|
|
+"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
|
|
|
+namespace.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The end results are equivalent for both delegation types. Once
|
|
|
+delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
|
|
|
+organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
|
|
|
+resources it received from the parent. The limits and other settings
|
|
|
+of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
|
|
|
+happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
|
|
|
+resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
|
|
|
+cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
|
|
|
+this may be limited explicitly in the future.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Delegation Containment
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
|
|
|
+can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
|
|
|
+requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
|
|
|
+to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
|
|
|
+"cgroup.procs" file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
|
|
|
+ common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
|
|
|
+processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
|
|
|
+in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
|
|
|
+user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
|
|
|
+all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
|
|
|
+ ~ cgroup ~ \ C01
|
|
|
+ ~ hierarchy ~
|
|
|
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
|
|
|
+currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs". U0 has write access to the
|
|
|
+file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
|
|
|
+destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
|
|
|
+not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
|
|
|
+will be denied with -EACCES.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
|
|
|
+that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
|
|
|
+namespace of the process which is attempting the migration. If either
|
|
|
+is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Guidelines
|
|
|
+----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Organize Once and Control
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
|
|
|
+and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
|
|
|
+process. This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
|
|
|
+inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
|
|
|
+of synchronization cost.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
|
|
|
+apply different resource restrictions is discouraged. A workload
|
|
|
+should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
|
|
|
+resource structure once on start-up. Dynamic adjustments to resource
|
|
|
+distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
|
|
|
+the interface files.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Avoid Name Collisions
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
|
|
|
+directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
|
|
|
+with interface files.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
|
|
|
+controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
|
|
|
+a dot. A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
|
|
|
+'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
|
|
|
+character for collision avoidance. Also, interface file names won't
|
|
|
+start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
|
|
|
+such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
|
|
|
+user's responsibility to avoid them.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Resource Distribution Models
|
|
|
+============================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
|
|
|
+depending on the resource type and expected use cases. This section
|
|
|
+describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Weights
|
|
|
+-------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
|
|
|
+active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
|
|
|
+weight against the sum. As only children which can make use of the
|
|
|
+resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
|
|
|
+work-conserving. Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
|
|
|
+used for stateless resources.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100. This
|
|
|
+allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
|
|
|
+enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
|
|
|
+valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
|
|
|
+process migrations.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
|
|
|
+and is an example of this type.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Limits
|
|
|
+------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
|
|
|
+Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
|
|
|
+exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
|
|
|
+valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
|
|
|
+process migrations.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
|
|
|
+on an IO device and is an example of this type.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Protections
|
|
|
+-----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
|
|
|
+the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
|
|
|
+protected levels. Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
|
|
|
+soft boundaries. Protections can also be over-committed in which case
|
|
|
+only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
|
|
|
+children.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
|
|
|
+noop.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
|
|
|
+are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
|
|
|
+process migrations.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
|
|
|
+example of this type.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Allocations
|
|
|
+-----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
|
|
|
+resource. Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
|
|
|
+allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
|
|
|
+available to the parent.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
|
|
|
+resource.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
|
|
|
+combinations are invalid and should be rejected. Also, if the
|
|
|
+resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
|
|
|
+may be rejected.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
|
|
|
+type.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Interface Files
|
|
|
+===============
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Format
|
|
|
+------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
|
|
|
+possible::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ New-line separated values
|
|
|
+ (when only one value can be written at once)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ VAL0\n
|
|
|
+ VAL1\n
|
|
|
+ ...
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Space separated values
|
|
|
+ (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Flat keyed
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ KEY0 VAL0\n
|
|
|
+ KEY1 VAL1\n
|
|
|
+ ...
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Nested keyed
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
|
|
|
+ KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
|
|
|
+ ...
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
|
|
|
+reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
|
|
|
+implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
|
|
|
+can be written at a time. For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
|
|
|
+may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Conventions
|
|
|
+-----------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
|
|
|
+ shouldn't have resource control interface files. Also,
|
|
|
+ informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
|
|
|
+ information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
|
|
|
+ interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
|
|
|
+ 10000] with 100 as the default. The values are chosen to allow
|
|
|
+ enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
|
|
|
+ intuitive (the default is 100%).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
|
|
|
+ limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
|
|
|
+ respectively. If a controller implements best effort resource
|
|
|
+ guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
|
|
|
+ and "high" respectively.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
|
|
|
+ used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
|
|
|
+ overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
|
|
|
+ appear as the first entry in the file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
|
|
|
+ "$VAL".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
|
|
|
+ the value to indicate removal of the override. Override entries
|
|
|
+ with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
|
|
|
+ with integer values may look like the following::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+ default 150
|
|
|
+ 8:0 300
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The default value can be updated by::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ or::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ An override can be set by::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ and cleared by::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+ # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
|
|
|
+ default 125
|
|
|
+ 8:16 170
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
|
|
|
+ "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
|
|
|
+ Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
|
|
|
+ generated on the file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Core Interface Files
|
|
|
+--------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.type
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
|
|
|
+ can be one of the following values.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
|
|
|
+ serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
|
|
|
+ It can't be populated or have controllers enabled. It may
|
|
|
+ be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
|
|
|
+ threaded subtree.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
|
|
|
+ "threaded" to this file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.procs
|
|
|
+ A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
|
|
|
+ all cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
|
|
|
+ the cgroup one-per-line. The PIDs are not ordered and the
|
|
|
+ same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
|
|
|
+ to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
|
|
|
+ reading.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
|
|
|
+ the PID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
|
|
|
+ following conditions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
|
|
|
+ common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
|
|
|
+ should be granted along with the containing directory.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
|
|
|
+ as all the processes belong to the thread root. Writing is
|
|
|
+ supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.threads
|
|
|
+ A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
|
|
|
+ all cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
|
|
|
+ the cgroup one-per-line. The TIDs are not ordered and the
|
|
|
+ same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
|
|
|
+ another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
|
|
|
+ reading.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
|
|
|
+ TID to the cgroup. The writer should match all of the
|
|
|
+ following conditions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
|
|
|
+ same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
|
|
|
+ common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
|
|
|
+ should be granted along with the containing directory.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.controllers
|
|
|
+ A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
|
|
|
+ the cgroup. The controllers are not ordered.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.subtree_control
|
|
|
+ A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
|
|
|
+ cgroups. Starts out empty.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
|
|
|
+ which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
|
|
|
+ cgroup to its children.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
|
|
|
+ can be written to enable or disable controllers. A controller
|
|
|
+ name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
|
|
|
+ disables. If a controller appears more than once on the list,
|
|
|
+ the last one is effective. When multiple enable and disable
|
|
|
+ operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.events
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ The following entries are defined. Unless specified
|
|
|
+ otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
|
|
|
+ modified event.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ populated
|
|
|
+ 1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
|
|
|
+ processes; otherwise, 0.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.max.descendants
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
|
|
|
+ If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
|
|
|
+ an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.max.depth
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value files. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
|
|
|
+ If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
|
|
|
+ an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cgroup.stat
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ nr_descendants
|
|
|
+ Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ nr_dying_descendants
|
|
|
+ Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
|
|
|
+ dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
|
|
|
+ in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
|
|
|
+ on system load) before being completely destroyed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
|
|
|
+ a dying cgroup can't revive.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
|
|
|
+ limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Controllers
|
|
|
+===========
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+CPU
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles. This
|
|
|
+controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
|
|
|
+normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
|
|
|
+realtime scheduling policy.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
|
|
|
+the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
|
|
|
+the root cgroup. Be aware that system management software may already
|
|
|
+have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
|
|
|
+process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
|
|
|
+before the cpu controller can be enabled.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+CPU Interface Files
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All time durations are in microseconds.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cpu.stat
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ It always reports the following three stats:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - usage_usec
|
|
|
+ - user_usec
|
|
|
+ - system_usec
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ and the following three when the controller is enabled:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ - nr_periods
|
|
|
+ - nr_throttled
|
|
|
+ - throttled_usec
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cpu.weight
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "100".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The weight in the range [1, 10000].
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cpu.weight.nice
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "0".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ This interface file is an alternative interface for
|
|
|
+ "cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
|
|
|
+ same values used by nice(2). Because the range is smaller and
|
|
|
+ granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
|
|
|
+ the closest approximation of the current weight.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ cpu.max
|
|
|
+ A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ The default is "max 100000".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The maximum bandwidth limit. It's in the following format::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ $MAX $PERIOD
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
|
|
|
+ $PERIOD duration. "max" for $MAX indicates no limit. If only
|
|
|
+ one number is written, $MAX is updated.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Memory
|
|
|
+------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory. Memory is
|
|
|
+stateful and implements both limit and protection models. Due to the
|
|
|
+intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
|
|
|
+stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
|
|
|
+complex.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
|
|
|
+cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
|
|
|
+accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent. Currently, the
|
|
|
+following types of memory usages are tracked.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- TCP socket buffers.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Memory Interface Files
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+All memory amounts are in bytes. If a value which is not aligned to
|
|
|
+PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
|
|
|
+PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.current
|
|
|
+ A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
|
|
|
+ and its descendants.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.min
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "0".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Hard memory protection. If the memory usage of a cgroup
|
|
|
+ is within its effective min boundary, the cgroup's memory
|
|
|
+ won't be reclaimed under any conditions. If there is no
|
|
|
+ unprotected reclaimable memory available, OOM killer
|
|
|
+ is invoked.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Effective min boundary is limited by memory.min values of
|
|
|
+ all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.min overcommitment
|
|
|
+ (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
|
|
|
+ than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
|
|
|
+ the part of parent's protection proportional to its
|
|
|
+ actual memory usage below memory.min.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Putting more memory than generally available under this
|
|
|
+ protection is discouraged and may lead to constant OOMs.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ If a memory cgroup is not populated with processes,
|
|
|
+ its memory.min is ignored.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.low
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "0".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Best-effort memory protection. If the memory usage of a
|
|
|
+ cgroup is within its effective low boundary, the cgroup's
|
|
|
+ memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be reclaimed
|
|
|
+ from unprotected cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Effective low boundary is limited by memory.low values of
|
|
|
+ all ancestor cgroups. If there is memory.low overcommitment
|
|
|
+ (child cgroup or cgroups are requiring more protected memory
|
|
|
+ than parent will allow), then each child cgroup will get
|
|
|
+ the part of parent's protection proportional to its
|
|
|
+ actual memory usage below memory.low.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Putting more memory than generally available under this
|
|
|
+ protection is discouraged.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.high
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Memory usage throttle limit. This is the main mechanism to
|
|
|
+ control memory usage of a cgroup. If a cgroup's usage goes
|
|
|
+ over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
|
|
|
+ throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
|
|
|
+ under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.max
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Memory usage hard limit. This is the final protection
|
|
|
+ mechanism. If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
|
|
|
+ can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
|
|
|
+ Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
|
|
|
+ temporarily.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ This is the ultimate protection mechanism. As long as the
|
|
|
+ high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
|
|
|
+ utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.events
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ The following entries are defined. Unless specified
|
|
|
+ otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
|
|
|
+ modified event.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ low
|
|
|
+ The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
|
|
|
+ high memory pressure even though its usage is under
|
|
|
+ the low boundary. This usually indicates that the low
|
|
|
+ boundary is over-committed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ high
|
|
|
+ The number of times processes of the cgroup are
|
|
|
+ throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
|
|
|
+ because the high memory boundary was exceeded. For a
|
|
|
+ cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
|
|
|
+ rather than global memory pressure, this event's
|
|
|
+ occurrences are expected.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ max
|
|
|
+ The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
|
|
|
+ about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim
|
|
|
+ fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ oom
|
|
|
+ The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
|
|
|
+ reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
|
|
|
+ killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
|
|
|
+ userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
|
|
|
+ disk readahead. For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
|
|
|
+ tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ oom_kill
|
|
|
+ The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
|
|
|
+ killed by any kind of OOM killer.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.stat
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
|
|
|
+ types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
|
|
|
+ on the state and past events of the memory management system.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ All memory amounts are in bytes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
|
|
|
+ can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
|
|
|
+ fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ anon
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
|
|
|
+ brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ file
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
|
|
|
+ including tmpfs and shared memory.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ kernel_stack
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ slab
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
|
|
|
+ structures.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ sock
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ shmem
|
|
|
+ Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
|
|
|
+ such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ file_mapped
|
|
|
+ Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ file_dirty
|
|
|
+ Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
|
|
|
+ not yet written back to disk
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ file_writeback
|
|
|
+ Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
|
|
|
+ is currently being written back to disk
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
|
|
|
+ Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
|
|
|
+ on the internal memory management lists used by the
|
|
|
+ page reclaim algorithm
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ slab_reclaimable
|
|
|
+ Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
|
|
|
+ dentries and inodes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ slab_unreclaimable
|
|
|
+ Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
|
|
|
+ pressure.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgfault
|
|
|
+ Total number of page faults incurred
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgmajfault
|
|
|
+ Number of major page faults incurred
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ workingset_refault
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ workingset_activate
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ workingset_nodereclaim
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgrefill
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgscan
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgsteal
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of reclaimed pages
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgactivate
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pgdeactivate
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pglazyfree
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pglazyfreed
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.swap.current
|
|
|
+ A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
|
|
|
+ and its descendants.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.swap.max
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
|
|
|
+ limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ memory.swap.events
|
|
|
+ A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ The following entries are defined. Unless specified
|
|
|
+ otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
|
|
|
+ modified event.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ max
|
|
|
+ The number of times the cgroup's swap usage was about
|
|
|
+ to go over the max boundary and swap allocation
|
|
|
+ failed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ fail
|
|
|
+ The number of times swap allocation failed either
|
|
|
+ because of running out of swap system-wide or max
|
|
|
+ limit.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When reduced under the current usage, the existing swap
|
|
|
+ entries are reclaimed gradually and the swap usage may stay
|
|
|
+ higher than the limit for an extended period of time. This
|
|
|
+ reduces the impact on the workload and memory management.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Usage Guidelines
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
|
|
|
+Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
|
|
|
+and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
|
|
|
+usage is a viable strategy.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
|
|
|
+throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
|
|
|
+opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
|
|
|
+more memory or terminating the workload.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
|
|
|
+memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
|
|
|
+more memory. For example, a workload which writes data received from
|
|
|
+network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
|
|
|
+performant with a small amount of memory. A measure of memory
|
|
|
+pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
|
|
|
+memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
|
|
|
+memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
|
|
|
+implemented yet.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Memory Ownership
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
|
|
|
+charged to the cgroup until the area is released. Migrating a process
|
|
|
+to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
|
|
|
+instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
|
|
|
+To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
|
|
|
+over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
|
|
|
+enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
|
|
|
+to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
|
|
|
+POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
|
|
|
+belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+IO
|
|
|
+--
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources. This
|
|
|
+controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
|
|
|
+limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
|
|
|
+only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
|
|
|
+blk-mq devices.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+IO Interface Files
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ io.stat
|
|
|
+ A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
|
|
|
+ The following nested keys are defined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ ====== ===================
|
|
|
+ rbytes Bytes read
|
|
|
+ wbytes Bytes written
|
|
|
+ rios Number of read IOs
|
|
|
+ wios Number of write IOs
|
|
|
+ ====== ===================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ An example read output follows:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ 8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
|
|
|
+ 8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ io.weight
|
|
|
+ A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
|
|
|
+ The default is "default 100".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The first line is the default weight applied to devices
|
|
|
+ without specific override. The rest are overrides keyed by
|
|
|
+ $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered. The weights are in
|
|
|
+ the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
|
|
|
+ the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
|
|
|
+ $WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT". Overrides can be set by writing
|
|
|
+ "$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ An example read output follows::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ default 100
|
|
|
+ 8:16 200
|
|
|
+ 8:0 50
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ io.max
|
|
|
+ A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ BPS and IOPS based IO limit. Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
|
|
|
+ device numbers and not ordered. The following nested keys are
|
|
|
+ defined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ ===== ==================================
|
|
|
+ rbps Max read bytes per second
|
|
|
+ wbps Max write bytes per second
|
|
|
+ riops Max read IO operations per second
|
|
|
+ wiops Max write IO operations per second
|
|
|
+ ===== ==================================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
|
|
|
+ specified in any order. "max" can be specified as the value
|
|
|
+ to remove a specific limit. If the same key is specified
|
|
|
+ multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
|
|
|
+ delayed if limit is reached. Temporary bursts are allowed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Reading returns the following::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Reading now returns the following::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ 8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Writeback
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
|
|
|
+written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
|
|
|
+mechanism. Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
|
|
|
+regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
|
|
|
+write IOs.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
|
|
|
+implements control of page cache writeback IOs. The memory controller
|
|
|
+defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
|
|
|
+maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
|
|
|
+writes out dirty pages for the memory domain. Both system-wide and
|
|
|
+per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
|
|
|
+of the two is enforced.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
|
|
|
+filesystem. Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
|
|
|
+and btrfs. On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
|
|
|
+the root cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
|
|
|
+which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked. Memory is tracked per
|
|
|
+page while writeback per inode. For the purpose of writeback, an
|
|
|
+inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
|
|
|
+from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
|
|
|
+which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
|
|
|
+associated with. These are called foreign pages. The writeback
|
|
|
+constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
|
|
|
+cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
|
|
|
+the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
|
|
|
+mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
|
|
|
+changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
|
|
|
+inode simultaneously are not supported well. In such circumstances, a
|
|
|
+significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
|
|
|
+As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
|
|
|
+doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
|
|
|
+strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
|
|
|
+areas wouldn't work as expected. It's recommended to avoid such usage
|
|
|
+patterns.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
|
|
|
+writeback as follows.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
|
|
|
+ These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
|
|
|
+ amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
|
|
|
+ memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
|
|
|
+ For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
|
|
|
+ total available memory and applied the same way as
|
|
|
+ vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+PID
|
|
|
+---
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
|
|
|
+new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
|
|
|
+reached.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
|
|
|
+controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller. For
|
|
|
+example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
|
|
|
+hitting memory restrictions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
|
|
|
+used by the kernel.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+PID Interface Files
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pids.max
|
|
|
+ A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
|
|
|
+ cgroups. The default is "max".
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Hard limit of number of processes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ pids.current
|
|
|
+ A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
|
|
|
+ descendants.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
|
|
|
+possible to have pids.current > pids.max. This can be done by either
|
|
|
+setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
|
|
|
+processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
|
|
|
+pids.max. However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
|
|
|
+through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
|
|
|
+of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Device controller
|
|
|
+-----------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
|
|
|
+creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
|
|
|
+existing device files.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
|
|
|
+on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
|
|
|
+create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
|
|
|
+to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
|
|
|
+BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
|
|
|
+the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
|
|
|
+structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
|
|
|
+(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
|
|
|
+If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
|
|
|
+it succeeds.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
|
|
|
+source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+RDMA
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
|
|
|
+of RDMA resources.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+RDMA Interface Files
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ rdma.max
|
|
|
+ A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
|
|
|
+ except root that describes current configured resource limit
|
|
|
+ for a RDMA/IB device.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
|
|
|
+ Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
|
|
|
+ limit that can be distributed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ The following nested keys are defined.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ ========== =============================
|
|
|
+ hca_handle Maximum number of HCA Handles
|
|
|
+ hca_object Maximum number of HCA Objects
|
|
|
+ ========== =============================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
|
|
|
+ ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ rdma.current
|
|
|
+ A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
|
|
|
+ It exists for all the cgroup except root.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
|
|
|
+ ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Misc
|
|
|
+----
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+perf_event
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
|
|
|
+automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
|
|
|
+always be filtered by cgroup v2 path. The controller can still be
|
|
|
+moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Non-normative information
|
|
|
+-------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
|
|
|
+the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
|
|
|
+cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
|
|
|
+root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
|
|
|
+level.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
|
|
|
+kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
|
|
|
+appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
|
|
|
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
|
|
|
+When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
|
|
|
+account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
|
|
|
+weight value of 200.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Namespace
|
|
|
+=========
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Basics
|
|
|
+------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
|
|
|
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts. The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
|
|
|
+flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace. The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
|
|
|
+its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root. The
|
|
|
+cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
|
|
|
+the cgroup namespace.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
|
|
|
+complete path of the cgroup of a process. In a container setup where
|
|
|
+a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
|
|
|
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
|
|
|
+to the isolated processes. For Example::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/self/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
|
|
|
+and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes. cgroup namespace
|
|
|
+can be used to restrict visibility of this path. For example, before
|
|
|
+creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
|
|
|
+ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/self/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/batchjobs/container_id1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
|
|
|
+ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/self/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
|
|
|
+the threads). This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
|
|
|
+legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
|
|
|
+mounts pinning it. When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace is destroyed. The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
|
|
|
+remain.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The Root and Views
|
|
|
+------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
|
|
|
+process calling unshare(2) is running. For example, if a process in
|
|
|
+/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
|
|
|
+/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root. For the
|
|
|
+init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
|
|
|
+process later moves to a different cgroup::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/self/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/
|
|
|
+ # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+ # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/self/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
|
|
|
+cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
|
|
|
+From within an unshared cgroupns::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # sleep 100000 &
|
|
|
+ [1] 7353
|
|
|
+ # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
|
|
|
+visible::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
|
|
|
+different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace root will be shown. For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
|
|
|
+its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Migration and setns(2)
|
|
|
+----------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
|
|
|
+namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups. For
|
|
|
+example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
|
|
|
+/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
|
|
|
+still accessible inside cgroupns::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/sub_cgrp_1
|
|
|
+ # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
|
|
|
+ # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
|
|
|
+ 0::/../container_id2
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged. A task inside cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
|
|
|
+(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
|
|
|
+ namespace's userns
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
|
|
|
+namespace. It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
|
|
|
+process under the target cgroup namespace root.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Interaction with Other Namespaces
|
|
|
+---------------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
|
|
|
+running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
|
|
|
+filesystem root. The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
|
|
|
+mount namespaces.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
|
|
|
+the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
|
|
|
+provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Information on Kernel Programming
|
|
|
+=================================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
|
|
|
+where interacting with cgroup is necessary. cgroup core and
|
|
|
+controllers are not covered.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Filesystem Support for Writeback
|
|
|
+--------------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
|
|
|
+address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
|
|
|
+following two functions.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
|
|
|
+ Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
|
|
|
+ associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup. Can be
|
|
|
+ called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
|
|
|
+ Should be called for each data segment being written out.
|
|
|
+ While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
|
|
|
+ during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
|
|
|
+ natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
|
|
|
+super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags. This allows for
|
|
|
+selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
|
|
|
+certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
|
|
|
+incompatible.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup. Depending on
|
|
|
+the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
|
|
|
+the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
|
|
|
+entry, may lead to priority inversion. There is no one easy solution
|
|
|
+for the problem. Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
|
|
|
+cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
|
|
|
+directly.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Deprecated v1 Core Features
|
|
|
+===========================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- All v1 mount options are not supported.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2. Use "cgroup.controllers" file
|
|
|
+ at the root instead.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
|
|
|
+====================================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Multiple Hierarchies
|
|
|
+--------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
|
|
|
+hierarchy could host any number of controllers. While this seemed to
|
|
|
+provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
|
|
|
+type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
|
|
|
+hierarchies could only be used in one. The issue is exacerbated by
|
|
|
+the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
|
|
|
+hierarchies were populated. Another issue was that all controllers
|
|
|
+bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
|
|
|
+hierarchy. It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
|
|
|
+the specific controller.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
|
|
|
+put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
|
|
|
+each controller on its own hierarchy. Only closely related ones, such
|
|
|
+as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
|
|
|
+hierarchy. This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
|
|
|
+similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
|
|
|
+whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
|
|
|
+It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
|
|
|
+the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
|
|
|
+used in general and what controllers was able to do.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
|
|
|
+that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
|
|
|
+length. The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
|
|
|
+in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
|
|
|
+addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
|
|
|
+which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
|
|
|
+of hierarchies.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
|
|
|
+topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
|
|
|
+controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
|
|
|
+completely orthogonal hierarchies. This made it impossible, or at
|
|
|
+least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
|
|
|
+completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary. What usually is
|
|
|
+called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
|
|
|
+depending on the specific controller. In other words, hierarchy may
|
|
|
+be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
|
|
|
+controllers. For example, a given configuration might not care about
|
|
|
+how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
|
|
|
+to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Thread Granularity
|
|
|
+------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
|
|
|
+This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
|
|
|
+ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
|
|
|
+much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
|
|
|
+individual applications and system management interface.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
|
|
|
+itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
|
|
|
+categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
|
|
|
+the application which owns the target process.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
|
|
|
+in combination with thread granularity. cgroups were delegated to
|
|
|
+individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
|
|
|
+sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them. This
|
|
|
+effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
|
|
|
+to lay programs.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
|
|
|
+exposed this way. For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
|
|
|
+extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
|
|
|
+construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
|
|
|
+and then read and/or write to it. This is not only extremely clunky
|
|
|
+and unusual but also inherently racy. There is no conventional way to
|
|
|
+define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
|
|
|
+that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
|
|
|
+accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
|
|
|
+system-management pseudo filesystem. cgroup ended up with interface
|
|
|
+knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
|
|
|
+revealed kernel internal details. These knobs got exposed to
|
|
|
+individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
|
|
|
+effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
|
|
|
+without going through the required scrutiny.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This was painful for both userland and kernel. Userland ended up with
|
|
|
+misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
|
|
|
+locked into constructs inadvertently.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
|
|
|
+-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
|
|
|
+interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
|
|
|
+children cgroups competed for resources. This was nasty as two
|
|
|
+different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
|
|
|
+settle it. Different controllers did different things.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
|
|
|
+mapped nice levels to cgroup weights. This worked for some cases but
|
|
|
+fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
|
|
|
+cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
|
|
|
+constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
|
|
|
+There also were other issues. The mapping from nice level to weight
|
|
|
+wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
|
|
|
+simply weren't available for threads.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
|
|
|
+cgroup to host the threads. The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
|
|
|
+the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed. While this allowed equivalent
|
|
|
+control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks. It
|
|
|
+always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
|
|
|
+otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
|
|
|
+implementation.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
|
|
|
+between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
|
|
|
+clearly defined. There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
|
|
|
+knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
|
|
|
+led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
|
|
|
+different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
|
|
|
+severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
|
|
|
+made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
|
|
|
+in a uniform way.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Other Interface Issues
|
|
|
+----------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
|
|
|
+idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies. One issue on the cgroup core side
|
|
|
+was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
|
|
|
+forked and executed for each event. The event delivery wasn't
|
|
|
+recursive or delegatable. The limitations of the mechanism also led
|
|
|
+to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
|
|
|
+the interface.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Controller interfaces were problematic too. An extreme example is
|
|
|
+controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
|
|
|
+all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
|
|
|
+cgroup. Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
|
|
|
+implementation details to userland.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+There also was no consistency across controllers. When a new cgroup
|
|
|
+was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
|
|
|
+restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
|
|
|
+explicitly configured. Configuration knobs for the same type of
|
|
|
+control used widely differing naming schemes and formats. Statistics
|
|
|
+and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
|
|
|
+formats and units even in the same controller.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
|
|
|
+controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Controller Issues and Remedies
|
|
|
+------------------------------
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Memory
|
|
|
+~~~~~~
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
|
|
|
+that is per default unset. As a result, the set of cgroups that
|
|
|
+global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out. The costs for
|
|
|
+optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
|
|
|
+implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
|
|
|
+basic desirable behavior. First off, the soft limit has no
|
|
|
+hierarchical meaning. All configured groups are organized in a global
|
|
|
+rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
|
|
|
+in the hierarchy. This makes subtree delegation impossible. Second,
|
|
|
+the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
|
|
|
+introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
|
|
|
+system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
|
|
|
+becomes self-defeating.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
|
|
|
+reserve. A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it's within its low,
|
|
|
+which makes delegation of subtrees possible.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
|
|
|
+limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
|
|
|
+But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
|
|
|
+available memory. The memory consumption of workloads varies during
|
|
|
+runtime, and that requires users to overcommit. But doing that with a
|
|
|
+strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
|
|
|
+working set size or adding slack to the limit. Since working set size
|
|
|
+estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
|
|
|
+OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
|
|
|
+end up wasting precious resources.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
|
|
|
+conservatively. When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
|
|
|
+into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
|
|
|
+OOM killer. As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
|
|
|
+aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
|
|
|
+lead to gradual performance degradation. The user can monitor this
|
|
|
+and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
|
|
|
+gives acceptable performance is found.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
|
|
|
+breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
|
|
|
+be exceeded. But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
|
|
|
+allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
|
|
|
+system than killing the group. Otherwise, memory.max is there to
|
|
|
+limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
|
|
|
+malicious applications.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
|
|
|
+subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
|
|
|
+limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
|
|
|
+limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
|
|
|
+new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
|
|
|
+control over swap space.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
|
|
|
+cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
|
|
|
+able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
|
|
|
+child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration. However, untrusted
|
|
|
+groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
|
|
|
+anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
|
|
|
+swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
|
|
|
+intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
|
|
|
+that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
|
|
|
+resources. Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
|
|
|
+and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.
|