|
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
|
|
|
* it seems like the reasonable thing to do.
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
* Must be called with both the i_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The fl_block
|
|
|
- * list itself is protected by the file_lock_list, but by ensuring that the
|
|
|
+ * list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring that the
|
|
|
* i_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the blocked_lock_lock
|
|
|
* in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty.
|
|
|
*/
|