浏览代码

cpufreq: conservative: Fix comment explaining frequency updates

The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.

Both increase and decrease happen at steps.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Stratos Karafotis 8 年之前
父节点
当前提交
42d951c851
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入2 次删除
  1. 2 2
      drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c

+ 2 - 2
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c

@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_step(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
  * sampling_down_factor, we check, if current idle time is more than 80%
  * (default), then we try to decrease frequency
  *
- * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction
- * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency
+ * Frequency updates happen at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum
+ * frequency
  */
 static unsigned int cs_dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {