Browse Source

drm/i915: Actually pass the reclaim gfp_t along to shmemfs!

Words cannot describe the embarrassment at creating a new gfp_t relaim to
only prevent the oomkiller but allow direct|kswapd reclaim, and then not
use it in the shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp().

Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170322223447.7493-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Chris Wilson 8 năm trước cách đây
mục cha
commit
40149f00fb
1 tập tin đã thay đổi với 1 bổ sung1 xóa
  1. 1 1
      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c

+ 1 - 1
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c

@@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@ rebuild_st:
 			reclaim = mapping_gfp_constraint(mapping, 0);
 			reclaim |= __GFP_NORETRY; /* reclaim, but no oom */
 
-			page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, gfp);
+			page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, reclaim);
 			if (IS_ERR(page)) {
 				ret = PTR_ERR(page);
 				goto err_sg;