浏览代码

sched/preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()

Now that PREEMPT_ACTIVE implies PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET, ignoring
PREEMPT_ACTIVE from in_atomic() check isn't useful anymore.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431441711-29753-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Frederic Weisbecker 10 年之前
父节点
当前提交
3e51f3c400
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 1 次插入1 次删除
  1. 1 1
      include/linux/preempt.h

+ 1 - 1
include/linux/preempt.h

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
  * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible.
  * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code.
  */
-#define in_atomic()	((preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) != 0)
+#define in_atomic()	(preempt_count() != 0)
 
 /*
  * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():