浏览代码

[ARM] 3384/1: AT91RM9200: Timer

Patch from Andrew Victor

If the timer interrupt is ever significantly delayed (or after the
system was suspended), the system could spin incrementing the time for
too long.
The fix is to replace the "do {} while" with a "while {}".

Orignal patch by Savin Zlobec and Peter Menzebach.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Andrew Victor 19 年之前
父节点
当前提交
39806805de
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 2 次插入2 次删除
  1. 2 2
      arch/arm/mach-at91rm9200/time.c

+ 2 - 2
arch/arm/mach-at91rm9200/time.c

@@ -71,11 +71,11 @@ static irqreturn_t at91rm9200_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_r
 	if (at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_SR) & AT91_ST_PITS) {	/* This is a shared interrupt */
 	if (at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_SR) & AT91_ST_PITS) {	/* This is a shared interrupt */
 		write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
 		write_seqlock(&xtime_lock);
 
 
-		do {
+		while (((read_CRTR() - at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_RTAR)) & AT91_ST_ALMV) >= LATCH) {
 			timer_tick(regs);
 			timer_tick(regs);
 			rtar = (at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_RTAR) + LATCH) & AT91_ST_ALMV;
 			rtar = (at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_RTAR) + LATCH) & AT91_ST_ALMV;
 			at91_sys_write(AT91_ST_RTAR, rtar);
 			at91_sys_write(AT91_ST_RTAR, rtar);
-		} while (((read_CRTR() - at91_sys_read(AT91_ST_RTAR)) & AT91_ST_ALMV) >= LATCH);
+		}
 
 
 		write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);
 		write_sequnlock(&xtime_lock);