Browse Source

jbd2: fix checkpoint list cleanup

Unlike comments and expectation of callers journal_clean_one_cp_list()
returned 1 not only if it freed the transaction but also if it freed
some buffers in the transaction. That could make
__jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() skip processing
t_checkpoint_io_list and continue with processing the next transaction.
This is mostly a cosmetic issue since the only result is we can
sometimes free less memory than we could. But it's still worth fixing.
Fix journal_clean_one_cp_list() to return 1 only if the transaction was
really freed.

Fixes: 50849db32a9f529235a84bcc84a6b8e631b1d0ec
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Jan Kara 10 years ago
parent
commit
33d14975e5
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
  1. 3 5
      fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c

+ 3 - 5
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c

@@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, bool destroy)
 	struct journal_head *last_jh;
 	struct journal_head *next_jh = jh;
 	int ret;
-	int freed = 0;
 
 	if (!jh)
 		return 0;
@@ -441,10 +440,9 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, bool destroy)
 		else
 			ret = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh) + 1;
 		if (!ret)
-			return freed;
+			return 0;
 		if (ret == 2)
 			return 1;
-		freed = 1;
 		/*
 		 * This function only frees up some memory
 		 * if possible so we dont have an obligation
@@ -452,10 +450,10 @@ static int journal_clean_one_cp_list(struct journal_head *jh, bool destroy)
 		 * requested:
 		 */
 		if (need_resched())
-			return freed;
+			return 0;
 	} while (jh != last_jh);
 
-	return freed;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*