Browse Source

documentation: Fix spelling of "operators"

Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney 10 years ago
parent
commit
297f739938
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
  1. 1 1
      Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt

+ 1 - 1
Documentation/RCU/rcu_dereference.txt

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ o	You must use one of the rcu_dereference() family of primitives
 o	Avoid cancellation when using the "+" and "-" infix arithmetic
 o	Avoid cancellation when using the "+" and "-" infix arithmetic
 	operators.  For example, for a given variable "x", avoid
 	operators.  For example, for a given variable "x", avoid
 	"(x-x)".  There are similar arithmetic pitfalls from other
 	"(x-x)".  There are similar arithmetic pitfalls from other
-	arithmetic operatiors, such as "(x*0)", "(x/(x+1))" or "(x%1)".
+	arithmetic operators, such as "(x*0)", "(x/(x+1))" or "(x%1)".
 	The compiler is within its rights to substitute zero for all of
 	The compiler is within its rights to substitute zero for all of
 	these expressions, so that subsequent accesses no longer depend
 	these expressions, so that subsequent accesses no longer depend
 	on the rcu_dereference(), again possibly resulting in bugs due
 	on the rcu_dereference(), again possibly resulting in bugs due