浏览代码

Fix broken "pipe: use event aware wakeups" optimization

Commit e462c448fdc8 ("pipe: use event aware wakeups") optimized the pipe
event wakeup calls to avoid wakeups if the events do not match the
requested set.

However, the optimization was buggy, in that it didn't actually use the
correct sets for the events: when we make room for more data to be
written, the pipe poll() routine will return both the POLLOUT _and_
POLLWRNORM bits.  Similarly for read.

And most critically, when a pipe is released, that will potentially
result in POLLHUP|POLLERR (depending on whether it was the last reader
or writer), not just the regular POLLIN|POLLOUT.

This bug showed itself as a hung gnome-screensaver-dialog process, stuck
forever (or at least until it was poked by a signal or by being traced)
in a poll() system call.

Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds 14 年之前
父节点
当前提交
28e58ee8ce
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 5 次插入5 次删除
  1. 5 5
      fs/pipe.c

+ 5 - 5
fs/pipe.c

@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ redo:
 			break;
 		}
 		if (do_wakeup) {
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLOUT);
+			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM);
  			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ redo:
 
 	/* Signal writers asynchronously that there is more room. */
 	if (do_wakeup) {
-		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLOUT);
+		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLOUT | POLLWRNORM);
 		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 	}
 	if (ret > 0)
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ redo2:
 			break;
 		}
 		if (do_wakeup) {
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN);
+			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM);
 			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 			do_wakeup = 0;
 		}
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ redo2:
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
 	if (do_wakeup) {
-		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN);
+		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM);
 		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	}
 	if (ret > 0)
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ pipe_release(struct inode *inode, int decr, int decw)
 	if (!pipe->readers && !pipe->writers) {
 		free_pipe_info(inode);
 	} else {
-		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLOUT);
+		wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLOUT | POLLRDNORM | POLLWRNORM | POLLERR | POLLHUP);
 		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_readers, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 	}