浏览代码

drivers/scsi/atp870u.c: fix bad use of udelay

The ACARD driver calls udelay() with a value > 2000, which leads to to
the following compilation error on ARM:

  ERROR: "__bad_udelay" [drivers/scsi/atp870u.ko] undefined!
  make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1

This is because udelay is defined on ARM, roughly speaking, as

	#define udelay(n) ((n) > 2000 ? __bad_udelay() : \
		__const_udelay((n) * ((2199023U*HZ)>>11)))

The argument to __const_udelay is the number of jiffies to wait divided
by 4, but this does not work unless the multiplication does not
overflow, and that is what the build error is designed to prevent.  The
intended behavior can be achieved by using mdelay to call udelay
multiple times in a loop.

[jrnieder@gmail.com: adding context]
Signed-off-by: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Martin Michlmayr 13 年之前
父节点
当前提交
0f6d93aa9d
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 10 次插入1 次删除
  1. 10 1
      drivers/scsi/atp870u.c

+ 10 - 1
drivers/scsi/atp870u.c

@@ -1173,7 +1173,16 @@ wait_io1:
 	outw(val, tmport);
 	outb(2, 0x80);
 TCM_SYNC:
-	udelay(0x800);
+	/*
+	 * The funny division into multiple delays is to accomodate
+	 * arches like ARM where udelay() multiplies its argument by
+	 * a large number to initialize a loop counter.  To avoid
+	 * overflow, the maximum supported udelay is 2000 microseconds.
+	 *
+	 * XXX it would be more polite to find a way to use msleep()
+	 */
+	mdelay(2);
+	udelay(48);
 	if ((inb(tmport) & 0x80) == 0x00) {	/* bsy ? */
 		outw(0, tmport--);
 		outb(0, tmport);