staging: lustre: coding style fixes found by checkpatch.pl

The patch removes "WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__'
to using 'xxxxxxxx', this function's name, in a string" warnings
reported by checkpatch.pl script.

Signed-off-by: Simo Koskinen <koskisoft@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd.c

@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ failed:
 net_failed:
 	kiblnd_shutdown(ni);
 
-	CDEBUG(D_NET, "kiblnd_startup failed\n");
+	CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s failed\n", __func__);
 	return -ENETDOWN;
 }
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c

@@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ LNetPut(lnet_nid_t self, struct lnet_handle_md mdh, enum lnet_ack_req ack,
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	CDEBUG(D_NET, "LNetPut -> %s\n", libcfs_id2str(target));
+	CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s -> %s\n", __func__, libcfs_id2str(target));
 
 	lnet_msg_attach_md(msg, md, 0, 0);
 
@@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ LNetGet(lnet_nid_t self, struct lnet_handle_md mdh,
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	CDEBUG(D_NET, "LNetGet -> %s\n", libcfs_id2str(target));
+	CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s -> %s\n", __func__, libcfs_id2str(target));
 
 	lnet_msg_attach_md(msg, md, 0, 0);
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c

@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ ldlm_flocks_overlap(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new)
 static inline void
 ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
 {
-	LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "ldlm_flock_destroy(mode: %d, flags: 0x%llx)",
-		   mode, flags);
+	LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "%s(mode: %d, flags: 0x%llx)",
+		   __func__, mode, flags);
 
 	/* Safe to not lock here, since it should be empty anyway */
 	LASSERT(hlist_unhashed(&lock->l_exp_flock_hash));

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c

@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int ldlm_init(void)
 void ldlm_exit(void)
 {
 	if (ldlm_refcount)
-		CERROR("ldlm_refcount is %d in ldlm_exit!\n", ldlm_refcount);
+		CERROR("ldlm_refcount is %d in %s!\n", ldlm_refcount, __func__);
 	kmem_cache_destroy(ldlm_resource_slab);
 	/* ldlm_lock_put() use RCU to call ldlm_lock_free, so need call
 	 * synchronize_rcu() to wait a grace period elapsed, so that

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c

@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ int ldlm_cli_cancel_list(struct list_head *cancels, int count,
 
 		if (res < 0) {
 			CDEBUG_LIMIT(res == -ESHUTDOWN ? D_DLMTRACE : D_ERROR,
-				     "ldlm_cli_cancel_list: %d\n", res);
+				     "%s: %d\n", __func__, res);
 			res = count;
 		}
 

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c

@@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ static void lov_lock_cancel(const struct lu_env *env,
 			cl_lock_cancel(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
 		} else {
 			CL_LOCK_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, slice->cls_lock,
-				      "lov_lock_cancel fails with %ld.\n",
-				      PTR_ERR(subenv));
+				      "%s fails with %ld.\n",
+				      __func__, PTR_ERR(subenv));
 		}
 	}
 }

drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c

@@ -1409,9 +1409,9 @@ void lu_context_key_degister(struct lu_context_key *key)
 	 */
 	while (atomic_read(&key->lct_used) > 1) {
 		spin_unlock(&lu_keys_guard);
-		CDEBUG(D_INFO, "lu_context_key_degister: \"%s\" %p, %d\n",
-		       key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "", key,
-		       atomic_read(&key->lct_used));
+		CDEBUG(D_INFO, "%s: \"%s\" %p, %d\n",
+		       __func__, key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "",
+		       key, atomic_read(&key->lct_used));
 		schedule();
 		spin_lock(&lu_keys_guard);
 	}
@@ -1548,7 +1548,8 @@ void lu_context_key_quiesce(struct lu_context_key *key)
 		 */
 		while (atomic_read(&lu_key_initing_cnt) > 0) {
 			spin_unlock(&lu_keys_guard);
-			CDEBUG(D_INFO, "lu_context_key_quiesce: \"%s\" %p, %d (%d)\n",
+			CDEBUG(D_INFO, "%s: \"%s\" %p, %d (%d)\n",
+			       __func__,
 			       key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "",
 			       key, atomic_read(&key->lct_used),
 			atomic_read(&lu_key_initing_cnt));