Sfoglia il codice sorgente

genirq/msi: Do not use pci_msi_[un]mask_irq as default methods

When we create a generic MSI domain, that MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS
is set, and that any of .mask or .unmask are NULL in the irq_chip
structure, we set them to pci_msi_[un]mask_irq.

This is a bad idea for at least two reasons:
- PCI_MSI might not be selected, kernel fails to build (yes, this is
  legitimate, at least on arm64!)
- This may not be a PCI/MSI domain at all (platform MSI, for example)

Either way, this looks wrong. Move the overriding of mask/unmask to
the PCI counterpart, and panic is any of these two methods is not
set in the core code (they really should be present).

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444760085-27857-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Marc Zyngier 9 anni fa
parent
commit
0701c53e46
2 ha cambiato i file con 5 aggiunte e 5 eliminazioni
  1. 4 0
      drivers/pci/msi.c
  2. 1 5
      kernel/irq/msi.c

+ 4 - 0
drivers/pci/msi.c

@@ -1243,6 +1243,10 @@ static void pci_msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
 	BUG_ON(!chip);
 	if (!chip->irq_write_msi_msg)
 		chip->irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg;
+	if (!chip->irq_mask)
+		chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
+	if (!chip->irq_unmask)
+		chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
 }
 
 /**

+ 1 - 5
kernel/irq/msi.c

@@ -228,11 +228,7 @@ static void msi_domain_update_chip_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
 {
 	struct irq_chip *chip = info->chip;
 
-	BUG_ON(!chip);
-	if (!chip->irq_mask)
-		chip->irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq;
-	if (!chip->irq_unmask)
-		chip->irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq;
+	BUG_ON(!chip || !chip->irq_mask || !chip->irq_unmask);
 	if (!chip->irq_set_affinity)
 		chip->irq_set_affinity = msi_domain_set_affinity;
 }