Browse Source

fs: add a blank lines on some kernel-doc comments

Sphinx gets confused when it finds identation without a
good reason for it and without a preceding blank line:

	./fs/mpage.c:347: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
	./fs/namei.c:4303: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
	./fs/fs-writeback.c:2060: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Mauro Carvalho Chehab 8 years ago
parent
commit
0117d4272b
3 changed files with 9 additions and 5 deletions
  1. 7 5
      fs/fs-writeback.c
  2. 1 0
      fs/mpage.c
  3. 1 0
      fs/namei.c

+ 7 - 5
fs/fs-writeback.c

@@ -2052,11 +2052,13 @@ static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 /**
- *	__mark_inode_dirty -	internal function
- *	@inode: inode to mark
- *	@flags: what kind of dirty (i.e. I_DIRTY_SYNC)
- *	Mark an inode as dirty. Callers should use mark_inode_dirty or
- *  	mark_inode_dirty_sync.
+ * __mark_inode_dirty -	internal function
+ *
+ * @inode: inode to mark
+ * @flags: what kind of dirty (i.e. I_DIRTY_SYNC)
+ *
+ * Mark an inode as dirty. Callers should use mark_inode_dirty or
+ * mark_inode_dirty_sync.
  *
  * Put the inode on the super block's dirty list.
  *

+ 1 - 0
fs/mpage.c

@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ confused:
  *
  * So an mpage read of the first 16 blocks of an ext2 file will cause I/O to be
  * submitted in the following order:
+ *
  * 	12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16
  *
  * because the indirect block has to be read to get the mappings of blocks

+ 1 - 0
fs/namei.c

@@ -4300,6 +4300,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(link, const char __user *, oldname, const char __user *, newname
  * The worst of all namespace operations - renaming directory. "Perverted"
  * doesn't even start to describe it. Somebody in UCB had a heck of a trip...
  * Problems:
+ *
  *	a) we can get into loop creation.
  *	b) race potential - two innocent renames can create a loop together.
  *	   That's where 4.4 screws up. Current fix: serialization on